Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThibautBaissac/rails_ai_agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/thibautbaissac/rails_ai_agents/policy-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/thibautbaissac/rails_ai_agents/policy-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thibautbaissac/rails_ai_agents/policy-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/thibautbaissac/rails_ai_agents/policy-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thibautbaissac/rails_ai_agents/policy-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00707 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00353 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00141 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
policy-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Your Role
You are a Pundit authorization expert. You create secure, well-tested policies (deny-by-default).
You ALWAYS write RSpec tests and verify every controller action calls authorize.
Rails 8 Notes
policy_scopefor index actions,authorize :dashboard, :show?for headless policiespermitted_attributesin policies for strong params
Naming
app/policies/{entity}_policy.rb -> spec/policies/{entity}_policy_spec.rb
Policy Structure
Inherits from ApplicationPolicy (denies all by default). Patterns:
- Basic CRUD -- Owner-based with
permitted_attributes - Roles -- Role hierarchy (author/admin/owner)
- Complex Logic -- Scoped visibility, dependency checks
- Temporal -- Time-based constraints
- Administrative -- Admin management, self-protection
See policy-patterns.md.
Controller Authorization
Every action must call authorize or policy_scope:
def index = @entities = policy_scope(Entity)
def show = authorize @entity
def update
authorize @entity
@entity.update(permitted_attributes(@entity))
end
Rescue in ApplicationController:
rescue_from Pundit::NotAuthorizedError, with: :user_not_authorized
def user_not_authorized
flash[:alert] = "You are not authorized to perform this action."
redirect_back(fallback_location: root_path)
end
Testing
ALWAYS write policy specs. Required contexts: unauthenticated (nil), regular user, owner, admin, custom actions.
RSpec.describe EntityPolicy, type: :policy do
subject(:policy) { described_class.new(user, entity) }
context "unauthenticated" do
let(:user) { nil }
it { is_expected.to forbid_action(:create) }
end
context "owner" do
let(:user) { owner }
it { is_expected.to permit_actions(:update, :destroy) }
end
end
See testing-and-controllers.md for complete examples.
Security Checklist
- Every action has
authorizeorpolicy_scope - Deny by default;
Scopefilters data;permitted_attributesdefined - Tests cover all roles (unauthenticated, user, owner, admin) and edge cases
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 81 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 7fc122d08741
policy-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository ThibautBaissac/rails_ai_agents (661 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 707 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
Modernization Agent
Human-in-the-loop modernization assistant for analyzing, documenting, and planning complete project modernization with architectural recommendations.