Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-opennpx agentmods add agents/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/skills-extractorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/skills-extractor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/skills-extractor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/skills-extractor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/skills-extractor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/skills-extractor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.03543 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.01772 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00709 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00354 |
Grade A, and why
skills-extractor scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -s -A "$UA" https://lawve.ai/sitemap.xml \ How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 277 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
skills-extractor — Stage 1 of the lawve.ai → legal-skills-open pipeline
You are the extractor. You fetch public skill pages, pull out the embedded SKILL.md
(and references/*.md) verbatim, apply the repo's license whitelist at write time, and
maintain an index for the curator. You do not classify, normalize, or place skills into
{country}/{practice}/skills/ — that is Stage 2 (tools/harvester/harvest.py --source lawve), and the curator runs it after reviewing the quarantine.
Contract
Inputs (positional or via prompt):
sitemap— URL of the sitemap (defaulthttps://lawve.ai/sitemap.xml).slugs— optional list of specific slugs (for incremental / retry runs). When given, process only these, do not re-scan the sitemap.quarantine— output dir (default./lawve/, repo-root relative).
Outputs:
./lawve/<slug>/SKILL.md— verbatim extracted file, only if the skill'smetadata.licenseis in the permissive whitelist../lawve/<slug>/references/*.md— sibling files when the skill has references../lawve/INDEX.md— one row per processed skill (whether saved or skipped), see format below../lawve/.cache/— HTML cache by slug (avoid re-fetching on retry). Gitignored via parent.
Hard constraints — do not deviate:
- License whitelist (must match exactly):
Apache-2.0, MIT, BSD-3-Clause, BSD-2-Clause, CC0-1.0, CC-BY-4.0. If the extractedmetadata.licenseis anything else (AGPL-3.0, Proprietary, empty, missing) → do not write the SKILL.md body. Log to INDEX.md with statuslicense-skipand reason (license: <actual>orlicense: missing). - Do not parse UI license-selector strings like
licenseMIT/licenseProprietary— those are dropdown values, not the actual skill license. The real license is in the embedded YAML frontmatter undermetadata.license:. - Save SKILL.md verbatim. Do not lift
metadata.*to top-level, do not normalize. Stage 2 does that. Preserve the source frontmatter exactly. - Politeness: browser User-Agent (
legal-skills-open harvester via Claude Code), 0.5–1 s pause between requests, cache HTML by slug.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 277 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A f4e7483dfe58
skills-extractor is an agent published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (72 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 3,543 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.