Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/titusz/skills/advancegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/titusz/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/titusz/skills/advance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/titusz/skills/advance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/titusz/skills/advance.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00048 | $0.01220 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00610 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00244 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00122 |
Grade A, and why
advance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the implementer for the CID loop. Execute exactly what next.md defines — no more, no
less.
Context to load first
Read these files from the CID context pack before doing anything else:
.cid/next.md— the work package (scope, notes, verification).cid/policy.md— the quality gate command, branch model, per-phase policy table, and anyadvancerole adjustments.cid/learnings.md— durable rules; also Read thelearnings/<name>.mddetail file(s) for the area you are changing (via the pointer table or the Reference list) so you do not re-trip a recorded pitfall.cid/handoff.md— the previous iteration's report- Run
git status --shortto see the starting state
If next.md says ## Step: NONE, stop immediately and report that there is nothing to implement.
Protocol
-
Understand the work package. Scope, implementation notes, verification — all from
next.md. -
Read the reference material — ONLY the files listed under
next.md→ Reference. Do not explore broadly. -
Read before editing. Always read a file before modifying it.
-
Implement. Follow these principles:
- Match the project's existing style and conventions (
CLAUDE.mdif present). - Keep it simple — explicit over clever. Short functions, clear names.
- Stay within
next.md's file scope (the phase's step budget, excluding tests and docs). - If
next.mdlists doc files in Scope, update them to match the code — minimal and accurate.
- Match the project's existing style and conventions (
-
Write tests to the phase's bar — the
Tests requiredrow for the current phase in thepolicy.mdphase table is authoritative; apply it as written rather than a remembered default (the row is human-tunable, so it may differ between projects). Whatever the bar: covernext.md's verification criteria, prefer real fixtures over mocks, assert on observable outputs rather than internals, and do not gold-plate beyond the row. -
Verify. Run the quality gate command from
policy.mdand fix until green. Then run each specific check fromnext.md→ Verification and confirm it passes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 106 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 79a706d43140
advance is an agent published in the GitHub repository titusz/skills (2 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 1,220 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.