Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tmdgusya/roach-piWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tmdgusya/roach-pi/reviewer-architecture)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tmdgusya/roach-pi/reviewer-architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tmdgusya/roach-pi/reviewer-architecture.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00821 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00411 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00164 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer-architecture scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 47 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 2f31a044592c
reviewer-architecture is an agent published in the GitHub repository tmdgusya/roach-pi (274 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 821 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
observability-reviewer
Reviews code changes for observability and telemetry quality — logging, metrics, spans, events, and attributes. Evaluates against OpenTelemetry best practices and specific conventions. Use as a sub-agent of review-pr for the Observability review dimension.
conventions-reviewer
Reviews code changes for adherence to naming conventions, code structure, patterns, and project-specific standards. Use as a sub-agent of review-pr for the Style & Conventions review dimension.
correctness-reviewer
Reviews code changes for logical correctness — bugs, edge cases, missing error handling, race conditions, and incorrect assumptions. Use as a sub-agent of review-pr for the Correctness & Logic review dimension.
security-reviewer
Reviews code for security vulnerabilities.
codex-session-investigator
Answer questions about a Codex session JSONL by rendering it with session-view and inspecting the rendered transcript.
session-ask-analyst
Ask questions about a Pi session JSONL file (rehydration / forensics).