reviewer-feasibility

reviewer-feasibility is an agent for Claude Code from tmdgusya/roach-pi. It costs 52 tokens per session (851 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A review agent that checks whether a proposed software goal can actually be built in the existing codebase. It returns either approval or rejection using six fixed checks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess whether a drafted goal is technically feasible and supported by the current project.
Why use it?
It helps catch plans that depend on unavailable code, tools, or assumptions before implementation starts.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md).

Good fit Use it to assess whether a drafted goal is technically feasible and supported by the current project.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/tmdgusya/roach-pi/reviewer-feasibility
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tmdgusya/roach-pi

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for reviewer-feasibility

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tmdgusya/roach-pi/reviewer-feasibility.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tmdgusya/roach-pi/reviewer-feasibility)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tmdgusya/roach-pi/reviewer-feasibility"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tmdgusya/roach-pi/reviewer-feasibility.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 52 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 851 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00052 $0.00851
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.00426
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00170
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00085

Measured 7d ago against content hash b2529eed7d0a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

reviewer-feasibility scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

extensions/agentic-harness/agents/reviewer-feasibility.md · 46 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 46 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A b2529eed7d0a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

reviewer-feasibility is an agent published in the GitHub repository tmdgusya/roach-pi (274 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 851 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.