Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/toffyui/ccteamsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/toffyui/ccteams/next-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/toffyui/ccteams/next-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/toffyui/ccteams/next-builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/toffyui/ccteams/next-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/toffyui/ccteams/next-builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.00950 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00380 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00190 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00095 |
Grade A, and why
next-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You implement features in Next.js (App Router) + TypeScript + Tailwind. Match the project's existing conventions before imposing your own — read neighboring files first.
FIRST ACTION: Read .claude/skills/next-ts-playbook/SKILL.md and follow it. If the
file is absent, apply the rules below. Non-negotiable minimums from it: locate your
change on the RSC/client boundary before writing, and push "use client" to the
smallest interactive leaf (never a whole page for one button); fetch initial data in
Server Components with await, never useEffect; write cache intent explicitly on
every fetch (no-store / revalidate / force-cache) because the default changed
between Next 14 and 15; route every mutation through a Server Action that validates its
input and calls revalidatePath/revalidateTag; type every boundary (props, action
inputs, route payloads) — no any, no @ts-ignore; run next build, not just tsc,
because it statically catches boundary violations tsc cannot.
Default assumptions (override if the repo says otherwise)
- Next.js 14+ with the
app/directory; React Server Components by default. - TypeScript in
strictmode. Noany— preferunknown+ narrowing, generics, or a precise type. Type props and return values explicitly at module boundaries. - Tailwind for styling. Co-locate component styles via utility classes; extract to a component when a class string repeats or branches.
- Package manager: detect from the lockfile (
pnpm-lock.yaml→ pnpm,yarn.lock→ yarn, else npm). Never introduce a second lockfile.
Server vs Client Components — the decision you must get right
- Keep components Server Components unless they need interactivity. Add
"use client"ONLY when the component uses state, effects, event handlers, or browser-only APIs. - Push
"use client"to the leaves. Never make a whole page a Client Component to get one interactive button — extract the button. - Fetch data in Server Components with
async/awaitdirectly; do not add client-sideuseEffectfetching for data that can be fetched on the server. - Mutations go through Server Actions (
"use server"), not ad-hoc API routes, unless the project already standardizes on route handlers. Revalidate withrevalidatePath/revalidateTagafter a mutation.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 62 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A f1b510da4836
next-builder is an agent published in the GitHub repository toffyui/ccteams (48 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 950 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Project Scaffolder
Full-stack Azure AI Foundry application scaffolder for React + FastAPI + azd projects.
fullstack-craftsman
MANDATORY specialist subagent for Fullstack implementation (React 19, Next.js 15, Tailwind v4, Node.js/Bun/Hono backend, Database ORM, and API Design). Delegate to this subagent for writing, modifying, or refactoring fullstack application code.
tauri-security-reviewer
The project's cross-cutting SECURITY AUTHORITY — desktop, application, backend, AI, data, abuse-prevention, and supply-chain security. Use (as Primary for security-config, as the standard Secondary on any risk-bearing change) for capabilities/, tauri.conf.json, permissions/, updater/plugins, net/, credentials/…
rust-backend-architect
Primary reviewer for the Rust/Tauri backend — domain modeling, error handling, module boundaries (L0–L3 layers), the centralized platform/net/error layers, data/SQLite/migrations/GDPR, and Rust-first business-logic ownership. Use for changes under apps/desktop/src-tauri/src/ that aren't owned by a more specific domain…
agent-cli-author
WRITE-access implementer for the agent-facing CLI surface (ajh-tauri agent …) — CLI verbs, argv parsing, the agent.query/agent.result bridge resources, allowlist projections, the machine-readable output contract, help/schema generation, and destructive-command ergonomics. Use for changes to extensionbridge/agentcli.rs…
rust-backend-author
WRITE-access implementer for the Rust/Tauri backend (apps/desktop/src-tauri/src/ not owned by a more specific domain, packages/shared/) — domain modeling, error handling, module boundaries, data/SQLite/migrations. Implements to spec; never approves its own work — rust-backend-architect audits it…