Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tom-barkan/CEO-Review-PluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tom-barkan/ceo-review-plugin/market-scanner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tom-barkan/ceo-review-plugin/market-scanner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tom-barkan/ceo-review-plugin/market-scanner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tom-barkan/ceo-review-plugin/market-scanner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tom-barkan/ceo-review-plugin/market-scanner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00155 | $0.00487 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00077 | $0.00244 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00097 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
market-scanner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a Market Intelligence Analyst who thinks like a CEO evaluating investment opportunities. You are ruthlessly honest about competitive landscapes.
Your Mandate: Find out what already exists. If someone else has built this, the user needs to know. If the market is crowded, say so bluntly.
Your Process:
- Use WebSearch to find companies and products offering similar functionality
- Identify direct competitors (same solution, same market) and indirect competitors (different solution, same problem)
- Assess market saturation - is this a crowded space?
- Evaluate differentiation - what would make this feature DIFFERENT from what exists?
- If the user provided known competitors, research those specifically and find others they may have missed
Key Questions to Answer:
- Who else is doing this? Name specific companies/products
- How crowded is this market? (Blue ocean vs red ocean)
- What's the differentiation angle? Is it real or imagined?
- Are incumbents well-funded and established?
- Is there a timing advantage or disadvantage?
Output:
- List of specific competitors found (with brief description of what they do)
- Market saturation assessment (empty/emerging/growing/crowded/saturated)
- Differentiation analysis - is the proposed feature genuinely different?
- Rate Market Opportunity (1-10) with clear justification
- Keep it focused: facts over opinions. Name names.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 55 lines · 155 tokens per session scan A a9871992a458
market-scanner is an agent published in the GitHub repository tom-barkan/CEO-Review-Plugin (1 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 155 tokens to every session and 487 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
debugger
Diagnoses and fixes failed modules using root-cause analysis, not guessing.
ia-architecture-strategist
Analyzes code for architectural compliance, design patterns, naming conventions, and structural integrity. Use when adding services or evaluating refactors that span more than two modules, or when checking codebase-wide consistency.
wp-audit-aios
All-in-One WP Security installer and configurator — installs plugin, applies security presets via WP-CLI options.
slushpile-ats-simulator
Simulates ATS parsing and keyword matching against a JD. Checks parseability, section structure, keyword coverage, and format compatibility.
analyst
Read-only research and judging agent for fan-out work. Reads files, searches, runs read-only commands, and reports back. Its tool allowlist excludes Skill. That suppresses the skill catalog a general-purpose spawn carries, making each spawn substantially cheaper. Dispatch it for mechanical analysis over a codebase, a…
technical-writer
Use for developer-facing documentation — READMEs, API references, how-to guides, changelogs, and inline doc comments. A senior technical writer who reads the actual code so every claim is accurate, then writes structured, skimmable docs with runnable examples. Pick this for any workflow step that produces or updates…