Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to tosin2013/documcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tosin2013/documcp/main/.github/agents/documcp-test.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tosin2013/documcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tosin2013/documcp/documcp-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tosin2013/documcp/documcp-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tosin2013/documcp/documcp-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tosin2013/documcp/documcp-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tosin2013/documcp/documcp-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00844 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00338 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00169 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
documcp-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an expert at writing tests for DocuMCP.
Testing Strategy
Coverage Requirements
- Global: 80% (branches, functions, lines, statements)
- Complex tools (e.g.,
recommend-ssg.ts): 60% - Excluded: Experimental memory features,
src/index.ts
Test Structure
tests/
├── tools/ # Individual tool testing
├── integration/ # Multi-tool workflows
├── memory/ # Memory system testing
├── api/ # MCP protocol validation
├── functional/ # End-to-end functional tests
├── benchmarks/ # Performance benchmarks
└── edge-cases/ # Error handling and edge cases
Tool Test Pattern
import { myTool } from "../../src/tools/my-tool.js";
import { formatMCPResponse } from "../../src/types/api.js";
import { promises as fs } from "fs";
import path from "path";
import { tmpdir } from "os";
describe("myTool", () => {
let testDir: string;
beforeEach(async () => {
testDir = path.join(tmpdir(), `test-${Date.now()}`);
await fs.mkdir(testDir, { recursive: true });
});
afterEach(async () => {
await fs.rm(testDir, { recursive: true, force: true });
});
it("should return success for valid input", async () => {
const result = await myTool({
path: testDir,
depth: "standard",
});
expect(result.success).toBe(true);
expect(result.data).toBeDefined();
expect(result.metadata.toolVersion).toBeDefined();
expect(result.metadata.executionTime).toBeGreaterThan(0);
});
it("should handle invalid input", async () => {
const result = await myTool({
invalidParam: "value",
});
expect(result.success).toBe(false);
expect(result.error).toBeDefined();
expect(result.error.code).toBe("TOOL_ERROR");
});
it("should validate path permissions", async () => {
const result = await myTool({
path: "/etc/passwd",
});
expect(result.success).toBe(false);
expect(result.error.message).toContain("permission");
});
});
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 146 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A f0f19ae55c5b
documcp-test is an agent published in the GitHub repository tosin2013/documcp (10 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 844 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
documcp-test compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| documcp-testtosin2013/documcp | Agent | 10 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 15 | Claude Code |
| test-generatortravisjneuman/.claude | Agent | 107 | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| FAI Collective Testerfrootai/frootai | Agent | 7 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 37 | Claude Code |
| backend-test-engineeralexmmatos/arthur-mcp | Agent | 2 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| test-strategistThe-AI-Directory-Company/agents-and-skills | Agent | 4 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 47 | Claude Code |
| test-engineermanutej/luxor-claude-marketplace | Agent | 63 | 4mo ago | none | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| testing-agentMyst4ke/mcp-to-skills-converter | Agent | 1 | 12mo ago | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |