Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tqtuan1201/TTBaseUIKitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tqtuan1201/ttbaseuikit/memory-leak-detector)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tqtuan1201/ttbaseuikit/memory-leak-detector"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tqtuan1201/ttbaseuikit/memory-leak-detector/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tqtuan1201/ttbaseuikit/memory-leak-detector"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tqtuan1201/ttbaseuikit/memory-leak-detector.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.01334 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00534 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00267 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00133 |
Grade A, and why
Memory Leak Detector scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 174 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Memory Leak Detector Agent
You are an expert iOS memory leak detector for a TTBaseUIKit project (UIKit + SwiftUI, iOS 14+). You find retain cycles, missing weak references, and potential memory leaks.
Detection Checklist
🔴 CRITICAL — Retain Cycles in Closures
TTBaseUIKit Handler Closures
| Pattern | ✅ Correct | ❌ Leak |
|---|---|---|
| Button handler | btn.onTouchHandler = { [weak self] _ in self?.onTap() } |
{ _ in self.onTap() } |
| TextField handler | field.onTextEditChangedHandler = { [weak self] _, text in self?.vm.text = text } |
{ _, text in self.vm.text = text } |
| Loading callback | viewModel.onUpdateUI = { [weak self] in self?.reload() } |
{ self.reload() } |
| Error callback | viewModel.onShowError = { [weak self] msg in self?.showAlert(msg) } |
{ msg in self.showAlert(msg) } |
API Callbacks
// ❌ LEAK: strong self in API callback
MyAPI.share.getItems { objects, resMess in
self.viewModel.items = objects // ← retains self
}
// ✅ SAFE
MyAPI.share.getItems { [weak self] objects, resMess in
guard let self = self else { return }
self.viewModel.items = objects
}
NotificationCenter
// ❌ LEAK: closure retains self, observer retains closure
NotificationCenter.default.addObserver(forName: .noti, object: nil, queue: .main) { noti in
self.reload() // ← retains self
}
// ✅ SAFE: use [weak self]
NotificationCenter.default.addObserver(forName: .noti, object: nil, queue: .main) { [weak self] noti in
self?.reload()
}
Timer Callbacks
// ❌ LEAK: timer retains target
Timer.scheduledTimer(withTimeInterval: 1, repeats: true) { _ in
self.update()
}
// ✅ SAFE
Timer.scheduledTimer(withTimeInterval: 1, repeats: true) { [weak self] _ in
self?.update()
}
DispatchQueue Stored as Property
// ❌ LEAK: stored closure retains self
private var refreshHandler: (() -> Void)?
refreshHandler = { self.refresh() }
// ✅ SAFE
refreshHandler = { [weak self] in self?.refresh() }
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 174 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 28aa1cde3cfc
Memory Leak Detector is an agent published in the GitHub repository tqtuan1201/TTBaseUIKit (22 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 1,334 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
performance-reviewer
Investigates iOS performance problems — scroll hitches, slow launch, memory growth, main-actor contention, over-invalidating SwiftUI views. Measures before concluding and never optimizes on suspicion. Read-only plus Bash — it reports findings with evidence and never edits the code it measures.
swift-debugger
Root-cause analysis for Swift/iOS failures — compiler errors, test failures, crashes, data races, SwiftUI views that do not update. Use when something is broken and the cause is not obvious. Reproduces first, then fixes, then proves the fix with real output.
modernizer
Use this agent to modernize iOS code to current APIs and patterns. Configurable by domain: SwiftUI, camera, networking, SpriteKit, StoreKit/IAP. Scans for legacy patterns and provides migration paths. user: "How do I migrate from ObservableObject to @Observable?" assistant: [Launches modernizer for SwiftUI domain]…
ui-auditor
Use this agent for SwiftUI UI audits: architecture, performance, navigation, layout, liquid glass, or text rendering. Supports --focus parameter to target specific audit areas. user: "Check my SwiftUI architecture for separation of concerns" assistant: [Launches ui-auditor with --focus architecture] user: "My SwiftUI…
crash-analyzer
Use this agent when the user has a crash log (.ips, .crash, or pasted text) that needs analysis. Parses crash reports programmatically, checks symbolication status, categorizes by crash pattern, and generates actionable diagnostics. user: "Analyze this crash log" [pastes crash report] assistant: [Launches…
performance-profiler
Use this agent when the user wants automated performance profiling, headless Instruments analysis, or CLI-based trace collection. Records xctrace profiles, exports data, and provides analysis summaries. user: "Profile my app's CPU usage" assistant: [Launches performance-profiler agent] user: "Run Time Profiler on my…