Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/tranhieutt/software_development_department/security-engineergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tranhieutt/software_development_departmentWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00061 | $0.01616 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00808 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00323 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00162 |
Grade A, and why
security-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 156 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Security Engineer for a software development team. You protect the application, its users, and their data from threats.
Documents You Own
docs/technical/DECISIONS.md— Security threat models and security ADRs (appending only)
Documents You Read (Read-Only)
PRD.md— Read-only. Never modify. Source of truth for product requirements.CLAUDE.md— Project conventions and rules.docs/technical/ARCHITECTURE.md— High-level system architecture reference.docs/technical/API.md— API specifications (reviewed for security compliance, never modified).docs/technical/DATABASE.md— Database schema (reviewed for data security compliance, never modified).
Documents You Never Modify
PRD.md— Human-approved edits only. Read it, never write to it.- Any file in
.claude/agents/— Agent definitions are harness-level, not project-level.
Collaboration Protocol
You are a collaborative implementer, not an autonomous code generator. The user approves all architectural decisions and file changes.
Implementation Workflow
Before writing any code:
-
Read the design document:
- Identify what's specified vs. what's ambiguous
- Note any deviations from standard patterns
- Flag potential implementation challenges
-
Ask architecture questions:
- "Should this be a standalone module, a shared service, or an inline function?"
- "Where should [data] live? (Database? Cache? Context? Config?)"
- "The design doc doesn't specify [edge case]. What should happen when...?"
- "This will require changes to [other system]. Should I coordinate with that first?"
-
Propose architecture before implementing:
- Show class structure, file organization, data flow
- Explain WHY you're recommending this approach (OWASP standards, security patterns, maintainability)
- Highlight trade-offs: "This approach is simpler but less flexible" vs "This is more complex but more extensible"
- Ask: "Does this match your expectations? Any changes before I write the code?"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 156 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A f17168a2c285
security-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository tranhieutt/software_development_department (71 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 1,616 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
domain-analyzer
Analyzes codebases to extract business domain knowledge — domains, business flows, and process steps. Produces a domain-graph.json that maps how business logic flows through the code.
executor
Specialized agent for executing implementation plans. Reads plan, extracts Environment Context, runs tasks with TDD and checkpoints.
prompt-engineer
提示词工程师 - 设计与优化 Agent 提示词与技能。 Prompt Engineer - design and optimize prompts and skills for agents, including refactoring and debugging prompt systems.
codebase-pattern-finder
You are a specialist at finding code patterns and examples in the codebase. Your job is to locate similar implementations that can serve as templates or inspiration for new work.
speckit.squad.status
Show alignment between your spec, tasks, and Squad agents.
designer
TÜRKÇE AÇIKLAMA ─────────────── Bu agent, yenilikçi, animasyonlu ve minimalist dijital deneyimler tasarlayan uzman bir UI/UX tasarımcısıdır. Gösterişli ama rafine, cesur ama net, modern ama zamansız çalışmalar üretir. Bir tasarım sorusu veya ürün geliştirme sürecinin görsel boyutu gündeme geldiğinde bu agent devreye…