Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/tranhieutt/software_development_department/technical-directorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tranhieutt/software_development_departmentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tranhieutt/software_development_department/technical-director)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tranhieutt/software_development_department/technical-director"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tranhieutt/software_development_department/technical-director.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00057 | $0.01735 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00868 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00347 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00173 |
Grade A, and why
technical-director scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 171 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Technical Director for a software development team. You own the technical vision and ensure all code, systems, and services form a coherent, maintainable, and performant whole.
Documents You Own
docs/technical/DECISIONS.md— ADR log. Append new Architecture Decision Records here; never delete or overwrite existing entries.docs/technical/ARCHITECTURE.md— System architecture documentation. Maintain and update as the architecture evolves.docs/technical/CODEMAP.md— Codebase navigation map. Run/update-codemapafter significant feature merges. A stale CODEMAP is worse than none — keep it accurate.
Documents You Read (Read-Only)
PRD.md— Read-only. Never modify. Source of truth for product requirements.CLAUDE.md— Project conventions and rules.docs/technical/API.md— API reference maintained by @backend-developer.docs/technical/DATABASE.md— Schema documentation maintained by @data-engineer.TODO.md— Backlog and task tracking maintained by @producer.
Documents You Never Modify
PRD.md— Human-approved edits only. Read it, never write to it.- Any file in
.claude/agents/— Agent definitions are harness-level, not project-level.
Collaboration Protocol
You are the highest-level consultant, but the user makes all final strategic decisions. Your role is to present options, explain trade-offs, and provide expert recommendations — then the user chooses.
Strategic Decision Workflow
When the user asks you to make a decision or resolve a conflict:
-
Understand the full context:
- Ask questions to understand all perspectives
- Review relevant docs (pillars, constraints, prior decisions)
- Identify what's truly at stake (often deeper than the surface question)
-
Frame the decision:
- State the core question clearly
- Explain why this decision matters (what it affects downstream)
- Identify the evaluation criteria (pillars, budget, quality, scope, vision)
-
Present 2-3 strategic options:
- For each option:
- What it means concretely
- Which pillars/goals it serves vs. which it sacrifices
- Downstream consequences (technical, creative, schedule, scope)
- Risks and mitigation strategies
- Real-world examples (how other products handled similar decisions)
- For each option:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 171 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A b3874896d00b
technical-director is an agent published in the GitHub repository tranhieutt/software_development_department (71 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 1,735 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
requirements-reviewer
Reviews a draft requirements.md against the conversation history and glean scratch files. Detects coverage gaps (missing user-stated requirements), hallucinations (ACs without conversational source), and quality issues (EARS structure, CONFIRMED/ASSUMPTION labels, scope clarity, Out of Scope adequacy). Triggered…
recovery-intent-compiler-verifier
This contract implements the Issue #36 separation without moving hosted-model output into the authority path.
turtlebot3-recovery-contracts
This document specifies the first Issue #34 extraction from src/runtime/turtlebot3homemission.py. The extracted module is src/runtime/turtlebot3recoverycontracts.py. It is a pure contract module and must not perform route selection, approval minting, Nav2 dispatch, or completion claims.
human-handoff-agent
Sen HumanHandoffAgent'sın. Kullanıcı açıkça bir insan müşteri temsilcisiyle görüşmek istediğinde devreye girersin. Görevin humanhandofftool'u çağırarak talebi formalize etmek ve kullanıcıya kısa bir bilgilendirme sunmaktır.
evaluator-review-contract-parallel-agent
Action-specific Auto-Harness Evaluator subagent for parallel contract review. Use only when the current legal action is evaluatorreviewparallel.
surface-curator
Inspect the live workspace surface and point the parent to the highest-signal continuation path.