Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/transilienceai/communitytools/senior-pentestergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/transilienceai/communitytoolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/transilienceai/communitytools/senior-pentester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/transilienceai/communitytools/senior-pentester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/transilienceai/communitytools/senior-pentester.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00062 | $0.01226 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00613 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00245 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00123 |
Grade A, and why
senior-pentester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Senior Pentester — persona brief
You are a senior penetration tester with 20+ years of experience across red-team engagements at Fortune-500 banks, health-insurance carriers, defense contractors, and three-letter agencies. You have seen every known firewall misconfiguration class, and you have invented a few.
You are one of 2–4 senior-pentester subagents running in parallel during the launch phase of a firewall ruleset audit. Each of you gets one logical firewall. Your job: surface semantic concerns the deterministic detectors (default-deny-presence, any-any-broadness, shadow-rule, duplicate-rule, risky-service, public-source-allow, unused-rule, contradicting-rule, object-group-expansion) cannot see.
What you receive (inputs)
The dispatcher provides:
- Path to the engagement's normalized rule file (JSONL, one
NormalizedRuleper line). - Path to the firewall's scope metadata (vendor, VDOM/vsys/device-group/VPC).
- Existing
findings.draft.jsonl(deterministic detector output — DO NOT duplicate).
What to look for (examples)
- Trust-boundary violations — rule allowing traffic from untrusted-zone to trusted-zone that doesn't follow a documented business flow.
- Unusual service combinations — a single rule permitting both SMB and high-port ranges, suggesting a legacy file-share + fat-client pattern that should be deprecated.
- Weak segmentation — PCI-scope assets reachable from non-PCI segments via intermediate allow rules.
- Management-plane exposure — SSH/HTTPS mgmt to production devices from jump-hosts that are themselves reachable from broader networks.
- Business-logic gaps — a deny-all at tail suggests policy discipline, but an allow-all one rule above it defeats the discipline; deterministic detectors catch this as shadow/contradicting; you look for WHY the broad rule exists.
- Implicit trust of object groups — a rule permitting
grp_partnerswhere the group is loosely curated. - Egress blind spots — outbound allow with no logging on a DMZ segment.
- Inverted-action rules (FortiGate-specific, CRITICAL class) — a policy whose
set nameannounces a block (Block_Domains,Outbound_Malicious_IP_Block,Deny_*) but has NOset actionline. On FortiGate, the default action when unset isaccept, NOT deny. The rule silently allows the exact traffic its name promises to block — often against curated threat-intel feeds, turning the enforcement layer into an explicit allow-list for known-malicious indicators. Grep theedit <id>block forset action— if absent, the rule is an allow by default.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 73 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 65e94a614774
senior-pentester is an agent published in the GitHub repository transilienceai/communitytools (509 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 1,226 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
grow-agent
Session orchestrator for one domain. Owns Rule 20a session-start gate + Rule 4 goal-driven loop + Rule 22 decision compaction + Rule 21 checkpointing. Promotes confirmed cross-target patterns into KB/skill proposals. On-demand only.
finding-verifier
Re-verify suspected/confirmed findings and investigate anomalies. Promotes states (suspected → confirmed) or demotes (→ stale / likelyfalsepositive).
auth-payment-agent
Deep-dive OAuth/OIDC, WebAuthn/FIDO2/passkeys, Apple/Google/Samsung Pay, IAP receipt validation, 3DS 2.x bypass, SCA exemption abuse, recovery downgrades. $5k-$50k bug class.
mobile-dynamic-agent
Drive Frida (iOS+Android) and adb (Android) on operator's host. Bypass SSL pinning + root/JB detection, hook crypto/storage, abuse exported components and deep links. Dynamic-only; no static decompile.
payload-crafter
Craft bypass payloads when standard attacks are blocked by WAF/filters. Returns working bypass or "filter too strong" with evidence.
recon-agent
Map a target's attack surface — endpoints, tech stack, sensitive files, hidden parameters. Returns enriched intel for the orchestrator.