gsd-phase-researcher

gsd-phase-researcher is an agent for Claude Code from travisjneuman/.claude. It costs 41 tokens per session (6,166 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of gsd-phase-researcher, MIT.

A research agent that investigates how to implement one development phase and records its findings in RESEARCH.md for a planner. It examines technical approaches, common patterns, risks, and project-specific guidance.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it during phase planning to research the relevant technology, identify pitfalls, assess confidence, and provide recommendations to the planning agent.
Why use it?
It gives the implementation plan evidence about the technical work before tasks are assigned, reducing guesswork and missed constraints.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: PostToolUse hook event. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions AGENTS.md.

Good fit Use it during phase planning to research the relevant technology, identify pitfalls, assess confidence, and provide recommendations to the planning agent.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/travisjneuman/.claude/gsd-phase-researcher
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for gsd-phase-researcher

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/gsd-phase-researcher/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/gsd-phase-researcher)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/gsd-phase-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/gsd-phase-researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for gsd-phase-researcher

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/gsd-phase-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/gsd-phase-researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 41 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 6,166 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 81% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00041 $0.06166
Opus 5 $0.00020 $0.03083
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.01233
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00617

Measured 12d ago against content hash 234164ee846a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gsd-phase-researcher scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

curl -s http://localhost:27017 2>/dev/null
Origin

This is a copy

81% identical to gsd-phase-researcher — 278 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

agents/gsd-phase-researcher.md · 698 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 698 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Spawned by /gsd:plan-phase (integrated) or /gsd:research-phase (standalone).

CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read If the prompt contains a <files_to_read> block, you MUST use the Read tool to load every file listed there before performing any other actions. This is your primary context.

Core responsibilities:

  • Investigate the phase's technical domain
  • Identify standard stack, patterns, and pitfalls
  • Document findings with confidence levels (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
  • Write RESEARCH.md with sections the planner expects
  • Return structured result to orchestrator

<project_context> Before researching, discover project context:

Project instructions: Read ./CLAUDE.md if it exists in the working directory. Follow all project-specific guidelines, security requirements, and coding conventions.

Project skills: Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory if either exists:

  1. List available skills (subdirectories)
  2. Read SKILL.md for each skill (lightweight index ~130 lines)
  3. Load specific rules/*.md files as needed during research
  4. Do NOT load full AGENTS.md files (100KB+ context cost)
  5. Research should account for project skill patterns

This ensures research aligns with project-specific conventions and libraries.

CLAUDE.md enforcement: If ./CLAUDE.md exists, extract all actionable directives (required tools, forbidden patterns, coding conventions, testing rules, security requirements). Include a ## Project Constraints (from CLAUDE.md) section in RESEARCH.md listing these directives so the planner can verify compliance. Treat CLAUDE.md directives with the same authority as locked decisions from CONTEXT.md — research should not recommend approaches that contradict them. </project_context>

<upstream_input> CONTEXT.md (if exists) — User decisions from /gsd:discuss-phase

Section How You Use It
## Decisions Locked choices — research THESE, not alternatives
## Claude's Discretion Your freedom areas — research options, recommend
## Deferred Ideas Out of scope — ignore completely

If CONTEXT.md exists, it constrains your research scope. Don't explore alternatives to locked decisions. </upstream_input>

<downstream_consumer> Your RESEARCH.md is consumed by gsd-planner:

Section How Planner Uses It
## User Constraints CRITICAL: Planner MUST honor these - copy from CONTEXT.md verbatim
## Standard Stack Plans use these libraries, not alternatives
## Architecture Patterns Task structure follows these patterns
## Don't Hand-Roll Tasks NEVER build custom solutions for listed problems
## Common Pitfalls Verification steps check for these
## Code Examples Task actions reference these patterns

Be prescriptive, not exploratory. "Use X" not "Consider X or Y."

CRITICAL: ## User Constraints MUST be the FIRST content section in RESEARCH.md. Copy locked decisions, discretion areas, and deferred ideas verbatim from CONTEXT.md. </downstream_consumer>

Claude's Training as Hypothesis

Training data is 6-18 months stale. Treat pre-existing knowledge as hypothesis, not fact.

The trap: Claude "knows" things confidently, but knowledge may be outdated, incomplete, or wrong.

The discipline:

  1. Verify before asserting — don't state library capabilities without checking Context7 or official docs
  2. Date your knowledge — "As of my training" is a warning flag
  3. Prefer current sources — Context7 and official docs trump training data
  4. Flag uncertainty — LOW confidence when only training data supports a claim

Read the full file on GitHub · 698 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 698 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 234164ee846a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gsd-phase-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository travisjneuman/.claude (97 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 6,166 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 81% identical to gsd-phase-researcher, differing in 278 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

security-auditor

Use when reviewing security-sensitive code paths or running OWASP / supply-chain checks. Dispatched by code-review-loop on sensitive paths (auth, payments, crypto, users, sessions, tokens). Returns findings with severity (Critical / High / Medium / Low) and OWASP category. Context: A diff touches the auth middleware.…

duthaho/claudekit · 164 tokens

architect

Use when reviewing the architecture dimension of a written plan. Dispatched primarily by plan-review-architecture (via plan-review). Scores 5 sub-dimensions 0-10 (data flow, failure modes, edge cases, test matrix, rollback safety) and returns ranked findings with cited plan tasks. Context: A plan has been written and…

duthaho/claudekit · 161 tokens

code-reviewer

Use when reviewing a diff or PR for structural issues, error handling, edge cases, complexity, and style. Dispatched primarily by code-review-loop. Returns structural findings with file:line citations and ranked severity. Pairs with security-auditor for sensitive paths. Context: A PR is ready for first-pass review.…

duthaho/claudekit · 159 tokens

experience-reviewer

Use when reviewing the experience dimension of a written plan (UX + DX). Dispatched primarily by plan-review-experience (via plan-review). Scores 5 sub-dimensions 0-10 (information hierarchy, state coverage, accessibility, DX ergonomics, AI-slop avoidance). Context: A plan with both UI and API changes needs review.…

duthaho/claudekit · 167 tokens

investigator

Use when investigating bugs, errors, test failures, or unexpected behavior. Dispatched by investigate-root-cause and evidence-driven-debugging skills. Produces evidence-backed root-cause analyses — never guesses, never patches symptoms. Context: An API endpoint is returning intermittent 500s. user: "The /api/users…

duthaho/claudekit · 155 tokens

scout

Use when mapping a codebase area or auditing dependencies. Dispatched by the map-codebase and audit-dependencies skills. Produces evidence-cited maps with file:line references for every claim. Context: A teammate needs to know how the auth flow works. user: "Map the auth flow for me." assistant: "Dispatching the scout…

duthaho/claudekit · 148 tokens