gsd-ui-auditor

gsd-ui-auditor is an agent for Claude Code from travisjneuman/.claude. It costs 41 tokens per session (3,879 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of gsd-ui-auditor, MIT.

A review of an implemented website or app interface against a design specification or a set of six visual standards. It can use screenshots or inspect the code when screenshots are not available.

In plain words
What is it for?
It checks the finished interface, compares it with UI-SPEC.md when that file exists, and writes findings to UI-REVIEW.md. It is for finding and prioritising visual issues in frontend code.
Why use it?
It turns visual problems into a scored report instead of leaving developers to spot them informally. The report highlights the three fixes that should be addressed first.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: PostToolUse hook event. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions AGENTS.md.

Good fit It checks the finished interface, compares it with UI-SPEC.md when that file exists, and writes findings to UI-REVIEW.md. It is for finding and prioritising visual issues in frontend code.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/travisjneuman/.claude/gsd-ui-auditor
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for gsd-ui-auditor

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/gsd-ui-auditor/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/gsd-ui-auditor)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/gsd-ui-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/gsd-ui-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for gsd-ui-auditor

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/gsd-ui-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/gsd-ui-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 41 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,879 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 88% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00041 $0.03879
Opus 5 $0.00020 $0.01939
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00776
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00388

Measured 12d ago against content hash 2a3a79391d42, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gsd-ui-auditor scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

DEV_STATUS=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" http://localhost:3000 2>/dev/null || echo "000")
Origin

This is a copy

88% identical to gsd-ui-auditor — 64 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

agents/gsd-ui-auditor.md · 440 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 440 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Spawned by /gsd:ui-review orchestrator.

CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read If the prompt contains a <files_to_read> block, you MUST use the Read tool to load every file listed there before performing any other actions. This is your primary context.

Core responsibilities:

  • Ensure screenshot storage is git-safe before any captures
  • Capture screenshots via CLI if dev server is running (code-only audit otherwise)
  • Audit implemented UI against UI-SPEC.md (if exists) or abstract 6-pillar standards
  • Score each pillar 1-4, identify top 3 priority fixes
  • Write UI-REVIEW.md with actionable findings

<project_context> Before auditing, discover project context:

Project instructions: Read ./CLAUDE.md if it exists in the working directory. Follow all project-specific guidelines.

Project skills: Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory if either exists:

  1. List available skills (subdirectories)
  2. Read SKILL.md for each skill
  3. Do NOT load full AGENTS.md files (100KB+ context cost) </project_context>

<upstream_input> UI-SPEC.md (if exists) — Design contract from /gsd:ui-phase

Section How You Use It
Design System Expected component library and tokens
Spacing Scale Expected spacing values to audit against
Typography Expected font sizes and weights
Color Expected 60/30/10 split and accent usage
Copywriting Contract Expected CTA labels, empty/error states

If UI-SPEC.md exists and is approved: audit against it specifically. If no UI-SPEC exists: audit against abstract 6-pillar standards.

SUMMARY.md files — What was built in each plan execution PLAN.md files — What was intended to be built </upstream_input>

<gitignore_gate>

Screenshot Storage Safety

MUST run before any screenshot capture. Prevents binary files from reaching git history.

# Ensure directory exists
mkdir -p .planning/ui-reviews

# Write .gitignore if not present
if [ ! -f .planning/ui-reviews/.gitignore ]; then
  cat > .planning/ui-reviews/.gitignore << 'GITIGNORE'
# Screenshot files — never commit binary assets
*.png
*.webp
*.jpg
*.jpeg
*.gif
*.bmp
*.tiff
GITIGNORE
  echo "Created .planning/ui-reviews/.gitignore"
fi

This gate runs unconditionally on every audit. The .gitignore ensures screenshots never reach a commit even if the user runs git add . before cleanup.

</gitignore_gate>

<screenshot_approach>

Read the full file on GitHub · 440 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 440 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 2a3a79391d42

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gsd-ui-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository travisjneuman/.claude (97 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 3,879 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 88% identical to gsd-ui-auditor, differing in 64 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

security-auditor

Use when reviewing security-sensitive code paths or running OWASP / supply-chain checks. Dispatched by code-review-loop on sensitive paths (auth, payments, crypto, users, sessions, tokens). Returns findings with severity (Critical / High / Medium / Low) and OWASP category. Context: A diff touches the auth middleware.…

duthaho/claudekit · 164 tokens

code-reviewer

Use when reviewing a diff or PR for structural issues, error handling, edge cases, complexity, and style. Dispatched primarily by code-review-loop. Returns structural findings with file:line citations and ranked severity. Pairs with security-auditor for sensitive paths. Context: A PR is ready for first-pass review.…

duthaho/claudekit · 159 tokens

experience-reviewer

Use when reviewing the experience dimension of a written plan (UX + DX). Dispatched primarily by plan-review-experience (via plan-review). Scores 5 sub-dimensions 0-10 (information hierarchy, state coverage, accessibility, DX ergonomics, AI-slop avoidance). Context: A plan with both UI and API changes needs review.…

duthaho/claudekit · 167 tokens

code-reviewer

A code-review agent that checks whether changes follow their specification and assesses code quality, security, maintainability, and performance. It reports findings with severity levels and file-and-line references.

sangrokjung/claude-forge · 96 tokens

security-reviewer

A read-only security review agent that checks code for common web risks, exposed secrets, unsafe input handling, authentication and authorization problems, and dependency issues. OWASP Top 10 is a widely used list of major web application security risks.

sangrokjung/claude-forge · 95 tokens

scout

Use when mapping a codebase area or auditing dependencies. Dispatched by the map-codebase and audit-dependencies skills. Produces evidence-cited maps with file:line references for every claim. Context: A teammate needs to know how the auth flow works. user: "Map the auth flow for me." assistant: "Dispatching the scout…

duthaho/claudekit · 148 tokens