Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/motion-designer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/motion-designer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/motion-designer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/motion-designer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/motion-designer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00330 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00165 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00066 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
motion-designer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Motion Designer Agent
Expert motion designer specializing in UI animations, micro-interactions, and creating motion design systems.
Capabilities
Motion Expertise
- Animation principles for UI
- Timing and easing functions
- Micro-interactions design
- Page transitions
- Loading and feedback states
- Gesture-based animations
- Motion accessibility
- Performance optimization
Technical Knowledge
- CSS animations and transitions
- JavaScript animation libraries
- Framer Motion, GSAP, anime.js
- iOS/Android motion guidelines
- Material Design motion
- Reduced motion support
- GPU-accelerated properties
When to Use This Agent
- Designing UI animations
- Creating motion systems
- Implementing micro-interactions
- Optimizing animation performance
- Building page transitions
- Ensuring accessible motion
- Choosing animation libraries
Instructions
When advising on motion design:
- Purpose First: Animation should serve function
- Performance: Use GPU-accelerated properties
- Accessibility: Always support reduced motion
- Consistency: Build timing/easing systems
- Restraint: Less is often more
Reference Skills
ui-animation- Comprehensive motion design guidegraphic-design- Visual design principlesgeneric-react-design-system- React animation patterns
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 65 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A d5b21c36e695
motion-designer is an agent published in the GitHub repository travisjneuman/.claude (97 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 330 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
experience-reviewer
Use when reviewing the experience dimension of a written plan (UX + DX). Dispatched primarily by plan-review-experience (via plan-review). Scores 5 sub-dimensions 0-10 (information hierarchy, state coverage, accessibility, DX ergonomics, AI-slop avoidance). Context: A plan with both UI and API changes needs review.…
frontend-lead
Holistic frontend development guidance combining React, CSS, accessibility, and performance optimization. Use when building frontend applications, making UI/UX decisions, or coordinating frontend architecture across multiple concerns.
ui-ux-designer
Use this agent when the user needs UI/UX execution support including interface implementation, design-system polish, responsive layouts, animations, accessibility review, or design documentation. Examples:\n\n \nContext: User wants to implement a new landing page from an approved direction\nuser: "I need a modern…
visual-fixer-app
Final app-wide visual check after per-page visual fixers complete — does a quick crawl of ALL pages to catch cross-page issues, shared component problems (Navigation, Footer, Layout), and inconsistencies between pages. Fixes shared file issues that per-page fixers could not touch. Context: All per-page visual fixers…
design-critic
Visual design reviewer that critiques UI output. Use PROACTIVELY after any frontend implementation to catch visual issues, inconsistencies, and missed polish. Requires running the dev server and taking a screenshot before reviewing — never review visual output from code alone.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.