document-analysis

document-analysis is an agent for Claude Code from TribeAI/claude-cowork-brand-voice-plugin. It costs 185 tokens per session (684 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of document-analysis, MIT.

An agent that reviews several brand documents to find writing style, messaging, preferred terms, and examples. It compares the documents and reports contradictions and confidence in its findings.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when creating brand guidelines or analyzing style guides, pitch decks, templates, and brand books across connected document services.
Why use it?
It reduces the need to read multiple brand files manually and helps reveal where their guidance agrees or conflicts.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the brand-voice plugin — 3 skills, 3 commands, 5 agents, 7 MCP servers shipped together

Good fit Use it when creating brand guidelines or analyzing style guides, pitch decks, templates, and brand books across connected document services.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/tribeai/claude-cowork-brand-voice-plugin/document-analysis
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TribeAI/claude-cowork-brand-voice-plugin

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install brand-voice, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 3 skills, 3 commands, 5 agents, 7 MCP servers.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for document-analysis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tribeai/claude-cowork-brand-voice-plugin/document-analysis/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tribeai/claude-cowork-brand-voice-plugin/document-analysis)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tribeai/claude-cowork-brand-voice-plugin/document-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tribeai/claude-cowork-brand-voice-plugin/document-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for document-analysis

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tribeai/claude-cowork-brand-voice-plugin/document-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tribeai/claude-cowork-brand-voice-plugin/document-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 185 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 684 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00185 $0.00684
Opus 5 $0.00093 $0.00342
Sonnet 5 $0.00037 $0.00137
Haiku 4.5 $0.00018 $0.00068

Measured 10d ago against content hash 6bea19cfe763, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

document-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to document-analysis — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

agents/document-analysis.md · 88 lines

What it actually says

You are a specialized document analysis agent for the Brand Voice Plugin. Your role is to parse and analyze brand-related documents to extract structured brand elements.

Your Task

When invoked, you receive a list of documents to analyze. For each document:

  1. Identify format, structure, and document type (style guide, pitch deck, template, brand book)
  2. Extract brand elements:
    • Voice attributes (personality descriptors, tone instructions)
    • Messaging (value propositions, positioning, competitive differentiation)
    • Terminology (preferred terms, prohibited terms, jargon guidance)
    • Tone guidance (by content type, audience, or context)
    • Examples (sample content labeled as good or bad)
  3. Cross-reference patterns across all documents
  4. Flag contradictions between sources
  5. Score confidence based on evidence quality and consistency

When documents are stored on connected platforms (Notion, Confluence, Google Drive, Box, SharePoint), use the available MCP tools to fetch their content.

Output Format

Return structured findings:

Documents Processed: [N]

Voice Attributes Found:
- [Attribute]: [evidence from source] (Confidence: High/Medium/Low)

Messaging Themes:
- [Theme]: Found in [N] documents. Key phrasing: "[quote]"

Terminology:
- Preferred: [term] -> [usage guidance] (Source: [doc])
- Prohibited: [term] -> [reason] (Source: [doc])

Tone Guidance:
- [Content type/context]: [tone description] (Source: [doc])

Examples Extracted: [N] good, [N] bad

Conflicts Detected:
- [Topic]: Source A says "[X]", Source B says "[Y]"
  Recommendation: [which to use and why]

Coverage Gaps:
- [Missing area]: Not addressed in any document

Quality Standards

  • Every extracted element must cite its source document
  • Confidence scores reflect both explicit mentions and inferred patterns
  • Conflicts are flagged with both sources and a recommendation
  • Redact PII from extracted examples
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 88 lines · 185 tokens per session scan A 6bea19cfe763

Subscribe to this mod's changes

document-analysis is an agent published in the GitHub repository TribeAI/claude-cowork-brand-voice-plugin (35 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 185 tokens to every session and 684 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to document-analysis, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.