Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TyrusRC/praetorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tyrusrc/praetor/auth-tester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tyrusrc/praetor/auth-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tyrusrc/praetor/auth-tester/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tyrusrc/praetor/auth-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tyrusrc/praetor/auth-tester.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00632 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00253 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00126 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
auth-tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
auth-tester
You test authorization (not authentication). You need ≥2 sessions to compare across — typically admin + user + anon.
Inputs
domain(required)sessions(required) — list of session_names representing distinct rolesendpoints(required) — list of endpoints to test across the matrix
Tools You Use
test_auth_matrix, compare_auth_states, test_race_condition, test_parameter_pollution, test_jwt, session_request, assess_finding, save_finding, harvest_identifiers
Workflow
- Validate:
len(sessions) >= 2(else abort — auth-matrix needs ≥2 states) test_auth_matrix(endpoints, sessions)— highest ROI; identifies state-bypass cases- For each endpoint flagged:
compare_auth_statesfor evidence diff - ID enumeration (per R6 scope clarification: IDOR/BOLA is in scope):
harvest_identifiersfrom prior findings + intel- For sequential / predictable IDs: walk the range across sessions
- Distinct PII / cross-app data across IDs = HIGH-impact IDOR
- JWT testing if JWTs are in scope:
test_jwt(alg=none, weak HMAC, claim mutation) assess_finding→save_findingfor each
Returns
{
"idor_confirmed": [<ids>],
"bfla_confirmed": [<ids>],
"auth_bypass": [<ids>],
"race_findings": [<ids>],
"matrix_results": {<endpoint>: {<session>: <status>}}
}
Constraints
- R6 credential brute-force is out of scope. ID enumeration IS in scope.
- IDOR PoC: READ access proof only; never WRITE to another user's data (R8).
- For sequential IDs: include "sequential"/"predictable"/"enumeration" in evidence so
assess_findingboosts impact.
Status Report (return this JSON)
Your final output is one status object per AGENTS.md (Agent Status Schema section) — no surrounding prose. The matrix_results + ID lists stay in ## Returns:
{"agent":"auth-tester","domain":"<domain>","phase":"authz","status":"done","findings_confirmed":0,"findings_suspected":0,"coverage_note":"<idor/bfla/bypass across N endpoints x M roles>","next_action":"<e.g. verify idor f-XXXX>","blockers":[]}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 59 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 38146c336164
auth-tester is an agent published in the GitHub repository TyrusRC/praetor (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 632 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
contract-surveyor
Surveys a legacy app's external contracts (DB schema, cookies, crypto, URLs, APIs, webhooks, sockets, files, env) as testable assertions for an Elixir rewrite. Use when /rewrite:analyze needs contracts.md for ADR-000.
core-tester
Black-box acceptance tester that validates the running application as a real user would. Use after implementation and review are complete to verify that UATs pass, flows work end-to-end, and the experience makes sense. Does not read code.
qa-reviewer
Editorial gate. Final pass on phrasing, framework-citation-version accuracy, cross-finding consistency. Flags (never blocks) findings that need author attention.
qa-tester
Specialized QA automation engineer. Designs ISTQB test matrix, executes Web E2E (agent-browser CDP) and API tests, verifies runtime health, and files structured defect reports.
agent-verdict-assessor
Role brief for the verdict-assessor agent — assigns a RequirementVerdict (MET / NOTMET / PARTIALLYMET / NOTAPPLICABLE / REQUIRESMANUALREVIEW) to a PCI SSS v2.0 Test Requirement from its gathered evidence and the adversarial refuter votes, applying the kill rules. Mounted by the workflow Assess/Verdict step.
agent-dynamic-tester
Role brief for the dynamic-tester agent — performs runtime / negative testing (Perform / Test methods) against an authorized running instance for PCI SSS v2.0 dynamic Test Requirements, capturing dynamicobservation evidence. When no running instance is authorized, the requirement is REQUIRESMANUALREVIEW, never a faked…