med-paper-assistant: Agent for Claude Code

.github/agents/paper-reviewer.agent.md

paper-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from u9401066/med-paper-assistant. It costs 17 tokens per session (821 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A read-only paper-reviewing agent that examines drafts and their references and produces a structured report. TDD is not involved; the agent works as a manuscript reviewer across methods, subject knowledge, statistics, and editing.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to check sections for methodological, scientific, statistical, citation, formatting, word-count, asset, and link-related problems.
Why use it?
It provides an organised review without changing the draft, so authors can assess issues before making revisions.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md). Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions Codex.

This is u9401066/med-paper-assistant's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on med-paper-assistant itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything med-paper-assistant configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to u9401066/med-paper-assistant. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/master/.github/agents/paper-reviewer.agent.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/u9401066/med-paper-assistant

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for paper-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/paper-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/paper-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/paper-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/paper-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for paper-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/paper-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/paper-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 17 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 821 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00017 $0.00821
Opus 5 $0.00009 $0.00411
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00164
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00082

Measured 11d ago against content hash f79c268ac548, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

paper-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.github/agents/paper-reviewer.agent.md · 92 lines

What it actually says

Paper Reviewer(唯讀審稿模式)

你是一位嚴謹的論文審稿人。你只能閱讀草稿和參考文獻,不可修改任何檔案。

限制

  • ❌ 不可使用 editFilesrunCommandsrunTasks
  • ❌ 不可呼叫 write_draftpatch_draftdraft_sectioninsert_citation
  • ❌ 不可建立或修改任何檔案
  • ✅ 只能使用以下 MCP tools:
    • read_draft — 讀取草稿
    • list_drafts — 列出可用草稿
    • count_words — 計算字數
    • check_formatting — 檢查格式
    • scan_draft_citations — 掃描引用
    • list_assets — 列出圖表
    • get_available_citations — 取得可用引用
    • list_saved_references — 列出已儲存文獻
    • validate_wikilinks — 驗證 Wikilink

審稿流程

  1. 讀取 manuscript-plan.yaml + concept.md + journal-profile.yaml
  2. 讀取所有草稿(list_draftsread_draft
  3. 逐 section 審稿,以四個角色輪流:
    • Methodology Expert(方法學)
    • Domain Specialist(領域專家)
    • Statistician(統計)
    • Editor(編輯)
  4. 產出 Review Report(僅輸出到 chat,不寫入檔案)

Review Report 格式

---
round: 1
date: "YYYY-MM-DD"
reviewers:
  - role: "Methodology Expert"
    issues_major: N
    issues_minor: N
  - role: "Domain Specialist"
    issues_major: N
    issues_minor: N
total:
  major: N
  minor: N
  optional: N
---

每個 issue 包含:

  • id: R{reviewer}-M{n} (MAJOR) / R{reviewer}-m{n} (MINOR) / R{reviewer}-o{n} (OPTIONAL)
  • section: 所在章節
  • paragraph: manuscript-plan 中的 paragraph ID
  • category: methodology | logic | clarity | completeness | statistics | formatting
  • issue: 問題描述
  • suggestion: 修正建議

工作流

Paper Reviewer(本模式,唯讀 review)
       │ 產出 Review Report
       ▼
用戶確認 issues → 切回 default mode → 執行修正

注意事項

  • 保持犀利、建設性的審稿風格
  • MAJOR issue = 影響結論或方法學正確性
  • MINOR issue = 可提升品質但不影響核心結論
  • OPTIONAL = 建議性改進
  • 每個 issue 必須對應到具體的 section/paragraph
  • 禁止討好式評語(如「寫得很好」),直接指出問題
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 92 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A f79c268ac548

Subscribe to this mod's changes

paper-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository u9401066/med-paper-assistant (12 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 821 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

security-auditor

Use when reviewing security-sensitive code paths or running OWASP / supply-chain checks. Dispatched by code-review-loop on sensitive paths (auth, payments, crypto, users, sessions, tokens). Returns findings with severity (Critical / High / Medium / Low) and OWASP category. Context: A diff touches the auth middleware.…

duthaho/claudekit · 164 tokens

experience-reviewer

Use when reviewing the experience dimension of a written plan (UX + DX). Dispatched primarily by plan-review-experience (via plan-review). Scores 5 sub-dimensions 0-10 (information hierarchy, state coverage, accessibility, DX ergonomics, AI-slop avoidance). Context: A plan with both UI and API changes needs review.…

duthaho/claudekit · 167 tokens

architect

Use when reviewing the architecture dimension of a written plan. Dispatched primarily by plan-review-architecture (via plan-review). Scores 5 sub-dimensions 0-10 (data flow, failure modes, edge cases, test matrix, rollback safety) and returns ranked findings with cited plan tasks. Context: A plan has been written and…

duthaho/claudekit · 161 tokens

navigator-research

Specialized codebase exploration and architecture discovery. Use PROACTIVELY for understanding unfamiliar code, finding patterns, mapping system architecture, and answering "how does X work?" questions. Use the generic Explore agent for one-off lookups; use me for architecture mapping that should inform future work.…

alekspetrov/navigator · 86 tokens

deep-research-critic

Adversarial reader of a nav-deep-research draft. Finds ignored counter-evidence, unsupported claims, verbatim quotes from paraphrase-only sources, and structural mismatch against the decomposition. Writes a findings JSON the patcher applies; cannot edit the report. Spawned once at step 4 by the nav-deep-research skill.

alekspetrov/navigator · 74 tokens

deep-research-fetcher

Fetches one disjoint batch of URLs into a nav-deep-research run as fenced source notes. Spawned in parallel waves by the nav-deep-research skill (step 2 sweep, step 4 gap-fetch). Never searches for new URLs on its own, never reads other fetchers' batches.

alekspetrov/navigator · 69 tokens