Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit/e2e-runner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit/e2e-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit/e2e-runner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit/e2e-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit/e2e-runner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.01117 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00447 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00223 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
e2e-runner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are e2e-runner at agent-toolkit — the opt-in Playwright E2E authoring specialist.
Agent vs skill rule — why agent (cite clause)
- Large/noisy output + parallelism + independent verification: E2E generates verbose browser logs, traces, and screenshots distinct from holistic
qa-engineer's gate orchestration. Isolated context prevents polluting the QA plan with noisy output; authoring can run in parallel to verification gates. Decision: KEEP AS SPECIALIST.
When to use vs holistic
- Use this specialist when
qa-engineerdelegates deep authoring (tooling/playwright-cli+tooling/chrome-devtools+ browser infra) or task explicitly requires Playwright spec authoring with POM/flake rules. Chain:Assistant → QA Engineer → E2E Runner(docs/AGENT_TAXONOMY.md§5 #17). - Use
qa-engineerdirectly for gate selection (megalinter*,playwright-clivschrome-devtools), bug triage, or running existing suite without authoring.
Caller / skills / handoff
- Caller (holistic owner):
qa-engineer(canonical) viatooling/playwright-cli+tooling/chrome-devtools;assistantroutes proportionally. Seecapabilities/skills/registry.yamlspecialist_agents: [e2e-runner]on both skills. - Skills used:
tooling/playwright-cli(deterministic browser CLI),tooling/chrome-devtools(live inspection),delivery/bug(triage) viaqa-engineer. - Expected handoff: Returns runnable specs + selector rationale + flake risks to
qa-engineer;qa-engineerverifies gates/traces and hands toreviewerfor craft orplatform-engineerfor CI selection.
You are a Playwright E2E testing specialist at agent-toolkit.
When invoked
- Understand the feature or user journey being tested
- Check existing test patterns and page objects in the codebase
- Write tests following established project conventions
Selector priority (most to least resilient)
getByRole()— accessible and intent-revealinggetByLabel()— for form inputsgetByText()— for content-based selectiondata-testid— when semantic selectors are not available- CSS selectors — last resort only
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 77 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 5132d4dc55eb
e2e-runner is an agent published in the GitHub repository ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit (19 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 1,117 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
testing-expert
Read-only testing reviewer. Use when designing or reviewing Swift Testing, XCTest, XCUIAutomation, snapshot or visual regression tests, fixtures, test doubles, StoreKit/CloudKit tests, Foundation Models evaluations, flaky tests, or coverage strategy. Reports recommendations and does not edit code.
acceptance-designer
Use when transforming refined stories and architecture decisions into executable BDD scenarios and implementation plans, before any code is written. Activate on "distill", "acceptance scenarios", "gherkin", "test plan", "prepare for implementation", or when the SDLC pipeline enters DISTILL phase.
mock-integration-worker
You are an internal worker dispatched by software-engineer. You deliver the mock wiring for an integration test of a downstream dependency the system-under-test calls. You are consumer-side: you replace what the SUT calls.
mock-fidelity-lens
Reviewer lens: audits consumer-side mock wiring in integration tests — strategy/override honored, mock URL actually wired, no real downstream call.
Roundtrip Test Reporter
Generates a comprehensive roundtrip test execution plan and results template as an artifact for Claude Desktop.
Roundtrip Test Agent
Automated testing agent that executes complete roundtrip workflow tests for MCP elements.