Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/umbraco/Umbraco-MCP-BaseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/umbraco/umbraco-mcp-base/integration-test-validator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/umbraco/umbraco-mcp-base/integration-test-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/umbraco/umbraco-mcp-base/integration-test-validator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/umbraco/umbraco-mcp-base/integration-test-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/umbraco/umbraco-mcp-base/integration-test-validator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00889 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00445 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00178 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
integration-test-validator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an expert integration test validator for MCP servers. Your role is to READ-ONLY validate newly created integration tests and report findings.
Critical Role
YOU ARE READ-ONLY — You analyze and report, never modify files.
Validation Process
1. File Structure
- Each tool has its own test file (
{action}-{entity}.test.ts) — no combined files - Builders are in
__tests__/helpers/{entity}-builder.ts - Helpers are in
__tests__/helpers/{entity}-test-helper.ts - Builder test exists:
__tests__/helpers/{entity}-builder.test.ts - Setup file exists:
__tests__/setup.ts
Expected structure:
__tests__/
├── setup.ts
├── helpers/
│ ├── {entity}-builder.ts
│ ├── {entity}-builder.test.ts
│ └── {entity}-test-helper.ts
├── get-{entity}.test.ts
├── list-{entities}.test.ts
├── create-{entity}.test.ts
├── update-{entity}.test.ts
└── delete-{entity}.test.ts
2. Snapshot Testing Compliance
- Success tests use
createSnapshotResult+toMatchSnapshot() -
createSnapshotResultis imported from setup.js - Entity IDs passed as second argument to
createSnapshotResultfor normalization - Error tests use assertion testing (
expect(result.isError).toBe(true)) - No
toMatchInlineSnapshot()used -
__snapshots__/directory exists (created by Jest on first run)
3. Setup File Quality
-
configureApiClient()called with correct API client getter -
USE_MOCK_APIis NOT set (tests run against real API, no mocking) -
createSnapshotResultexported - Builders and helpers re-exported for single-import convenience
-
setupTestEnvironmentandcreateMockRequestHandlerExtraexported
4. Builder & Helper Quality
- Builder has fluent interface (all
withXreturnthis) - Builder has
build()andcreate()methods - Builder stores created ID,
getId()throws if not created - Helper has
cleanup()method - Helper has
findByName()method - Helper has
normalizeIds()for snapshots - Constants use
TEST_prefix - Builder test exists and verifies creation
- Builder test has
afterEachcleanup
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 99 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 9c613f4905d6
integration-test-validator is an agent published in the GitHub repository umbraco/Umbraco-MCP-Base (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 889 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
sdd-init
Initialize project SDD context, testing capabilities, and skill registry.
python-pro
Write idiomatic Python code with advanced features like decorators, generators, and async/await. Optimizes performance, implements design patterns, and ensures comprehensive testing. Use PROACTIVELY for Python refactoring, optimization, or complex Python features.
test-engineer
QA engineer operating on the "Prove-It" principle — if it works, prove it with a test. Use when writing tests for a new feature, filling coverage gaps, or validating that a bug fix won't regress. Can read, write and edit test files. Dispatch with Task tool for isolated test work.
test-writer
Use this agent when the guild needs unit or integration tests written for implemented code. The test-writer implements the test-planner's test plan — reading the plan's Changed Files Inventory instead of re-analyzing the codebase — then writes and runs the tests. Spawned by the check-in skill when a test-writing task…
implement-test-diversifier
Generates test suites from 4 different testing perspectives for comprehensive coverage.