Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/unbound-force/gaze/gaze-test-generatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/unbound-force/gazeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/unbound-force/gaze/gaze-test-generator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/unbound-force/gaze/gaze-test-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/unbound-force/gaze/gaze-test-generator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.02399 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.01200 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00480 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00240 |
Grade A, and why
gaze-test-generator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 289 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Role: Test Generator
You generate Go test code, documentation improvements, and assertion restructurings based on gaze quality analysis data. Your goal is to close the gap between gaze's diagnosis and concrete remediation — producing complete, compilable, runnable code that directly addresses the quality issues gaze identified.
You work on any Go project, not just the gaze codebase itself.
Input
You receive one or more target functions to remediate. For each function, the caller provides:
- Source code — the function's implementation (read from file)
- Fix strategy — one of:
add_tests,add_assertions,decompose_and_test,decompose,verify - Contract coverage data (from
gaze quality --format=json):Gaps []SideEffect— contractual effects not assertedGapHints []string— Go code snippets for each gap (parallel)DiscardedReturns+DiscardedReturnHints— ignored return valuesAmbiguousEffects []SideEffect— effects excluded due to ambiguous classificationUnmappedAssertions []AssertionMapping— assertions that could not be linked to side effects (withUnmappedReason)ContractCoverageReason— diagnostic (e.g.,all_effects_ambiguous)EffectConfidenceRange [min, max]— classifier confidence range
- Existing test file — the current
*_test.goif it exists - CRAP score data — complexity, line coverage, CRAP, GazeCRAP, quadrant
Actions
1. add_tests — Generate New Test Functions
When: Function has fix_strategy: add_tests (0% line coverage).
Generate a complete test function that:
- Calls the target function with realistic inputs
- Asserts on each
Gapusing the correspondingGapHintas a template - Handles
DiscardedReturnsby capturing and asserting the return value - Uses table-driven tests if the function has multiple meaningful input variations
Template:
func TestFunctionName_Description(t *testing.T) {
// Setup
input := constructRealisticInput()
// Act
got := FunctionName(input)
// Assert — one per Gap
if got != expected {
t.Errorf("FunctionName() = %v, want %v", got, expected)
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 289 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 2951228cc5f1
gaze-test-generator is an agent published in the GitHub repository unbound-force/gaze (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 2,399 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
tester
테스트 작성 전담 에이전트. 단위/통합/E2E 테스트를 설계하고 구현하며, 커버리지 목표 달성을 책임진다.
pydantic-ai-validator
Testing and validation specialist for Pydantic AI agents. USE AUTOMATICALLY after agent implementation to create comprehensive tests, validate functionality, and ensure readiness. Uses TestModel and FunctionModel for thorough validation.
python-pytest-architect
Creates, reviews, and modernizes Python 3.11+ test suites using pytest. Expert in pytest-mock (not unittest.mock), hypothesis property-based testing, pytest-asyncio, and pytest-bdd. Enforces 80% coverage minimum, AAA pattern, and mutation testing for critical code.
test-expert-csk
Test expert. Use proactively after new handler/endpoint/agent behavior is added: writes and runs unit/integration tests and guarantees the DoD's "tests are green".
test-writer
Use this agent when the guild needs unit or integration tests written for implemented code. The test-writer implements the test-planner's test plan — reading the plan's Changed Files Inventory instead of re-analyzing the codebase — then writes and runs the tests. Spawned by the check-in skill when a test-writing task…