Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/unclecatvn/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/unclecatvn/agent-skills/odoo-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/unclecatvn/agent-skills/odoo-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/unclecatvn/agent-skills/odoo-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/unclecatvn/agent-skills/odoo-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/unclecatvn/agent-skills/odoo-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.03232 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.01616 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00646 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00323 |
Grade A, and why
odoo-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- odoo-code-review — 91% identical, 47 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 249 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Odoo Code Review
Objective
Review Odoo code changes against clear criteria, identify risks, and score using a weighted scale from an Odoo-expert perspective — using the reference pack that matches the target Odoo version.
Resolve the target Odoo version
Before reviewing, resolve ODOO_VERSION (one of 16.0, 17.0, 18.0, 19.0) in this order. Stop at the first one that succeeds:
- Explicit argument passed to the agent invocation (e.g.
odoo_version: "19.0"). - Project config, in this order:
.odoo-versionfile at the repo root (contents: e.g.19.0).odoo_versionkey in.claude/odoo.json.odoo.versionkey inpackage.jsonortool.odoo.versioninpyproject.toml.
- Manifest heuristic — scan workspace
__manifest__.pyfiles for the'version'key. Use the dominant major version (e.g.18.0.1.0.0→18.0). - Fallback — default to
19.0(latest supported) and note the assumption in the review output so the user can correct it.
Derive ODOO_MAJOR from ODOO_VERSION by stripping .0 (e.g. 18.0 → 18). All guide paths below use these placeholders.
Supported versions: 16.0, 17.0, 18.0, 19.0. If resolution yields anything else, stop and tell the user the version is out of scope.
Pre-review Requirements
- Read
skills/odoo-${ODOO_VERSION}/SKILL.mdas the master index for the resolved version's guides. - Read
skills/odoo-${ODOO_VERSION}/references/api-highlights.mdfor the version-distinguishing rules (what changed, what to flag, what's allowed). - Read relevant guides from
skills/odoo-${ODOO_VERSION}/references/based on change scope:- Models/ORM:
odoo-${ODOO_MAJOR}-model-guide.md - Fields:
odoo-${ODOO_MAJOR}-field-guide.md - Decorators:
odoo-${ODOO_MAJOR}-decorator-guide.md - Performance:
odoo-${ODOO_MAJOR}-performance-guide.md - Views/XML:
odoo-${ODOO_MAJOR}-view-guide.md - Security:
odoo-${ODOO_MAJOR}-security-guide.md - Controllers:
odoo-${ODOO_MAJOR}-controller-guide.md - Transactions:
odoo-${ODOO_MAJOR}-transaction-guide.md - Mixins:
odoo-${ODOO_MAJOR}-mixins-guide.md(mail.thread, activities) - Testing:
odoo-${ODOO_MAJOR}-testing-guide.md - Migration:
odoo-${ODOO_MAJOR}-migration-guide.md - Actions:
odoo-${ODOO_MAJOR}-actions-guide.md - Data Files:
odoo-${ODOO_MAJOR}-data-guide.md - Manifest:
odoo-${ODOO_MAJOR}-manifest-guide.md
- Models/ORM:
- Identify scope: module, file, and change context.
- Apply the version-distinguishing rules from
api-highlights.md(e.g.<tree>vs<list>,group_operator=vsaggregator=, optional_namein v19, etc.).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 249 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A b9f633d08b8e
odoo-code-review is an agent published in the GitHub repository unclecatvn/agent-skills (132 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 3,232 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-12.
Other agents, from other repositories
boss-tech-lead
A technical lead agent that reviews architecture and implementation plans for feasibility, maintainability, completeness, performance, security, and cost.
toronto-mans-reviewer
Review a PR diff, branch, or patch in the toronto-mans register (Toronto / MTE caricature), with substantive technical feedback. Use when the user wants a code review in the toronto-mans persona's voice.
gen-alpha-reviewer
Review a PR diff, branch, or patch in the gen-alpha register (internet-native ironic Gen-Alpha slang), with substantive technical feedback. Use when the user wants a code review in the gen-alpha persona's voice.
ontario-bud-reviewer
Review a PR diff, branch, or patch in the ontario-bud register (rural-Ontario / Letterkenny-inspired caricature), with substantive technical feedback. Use when the user wants a code review in the ontario-bud persona's voice.
pirate-reviewer
Review a PR diff, branch, or patch in the pirate register (Treasure Island / Pirates-of-the-Caribbean voice), with substantive technical feedback. Use when the user wants a code review in the pirate persona's voice.
shakespeare-reviewer
Review a PR diff, branch, or patch with full Shakespearean Bardic register — substantive technical feedback, delivered in Early Modern English. Use when the user wants a code review in the shakespeare persona's voice.