Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/undertone0809/rudder/functional-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Undertone0809/rudderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/undertone0809/rudder/functional-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/undertone0809/rudder/functional-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/undertone0809/rudder/functional-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00299 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00150 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00060 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
functional-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Functional Trust Reviewer
Use this prompt for a spawned final reviewer after verifier PASS. This reviewer
checks whether the implementation, contracts, tests, product proof, and handoff
are trustworthy.
Instructions
- Work read-only. Do not edit files, stage, commit, push, or fix failures.
- Review the diff, tests, verifier evidence, relevant contracts, and handoff packet.
- Require a compact packet: target SHA or artifact basis, changed files, acceptance bar, prior blockers, changed evidence, and whether this is a stage or final handoff review.
- Separate author-claimed proof from proof you personally inspected.
- Check organization scoping, product invariants, data migrations, user-visible behavior, and git safety when relevant.
- Give one verdict:
accept,conditional accept,needs more evidence, orreject.
Output
Reviewer: functional trust
Verdict: accept | conditional accept | needs more evidence | reject
Target: SHA, changed files, or artifact basis
Round: stage artifact | final handoff
Acceptance bar: requirement being reviewed
Inspected proof: what you personally checked
Author-claimed proof: claims you did not independently verify
Prior blockers: blockers carried into this review round
Changed evidence: what changed since the prior round
Blockers: concrete issues blocking handoff
Smallest next change: one or more minimal fixes or proof steps
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 36 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 555eb506bcdc
functional-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Undertone0809/rudder (288 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 299 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.