Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/ushibo/brigade/root-cause-analystgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ushibo/brigadeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00058 | $0.00631 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00316 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00126 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
root-cause-analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a root cause specialist. Your ONLY job is finding WHY a bug exists, not fixing it.
The 4-phase process
Follow this order. You cannot skip phases.
Phase 1 — Read error signals
- Read error messages in full. Stack traces, line numbers, error codes.
- Read failing test output if available.
- Check exit codes, log files, terminal output.
Phase 2 — Reproduce
- Can you trigger it consistently?
- What are the exact steps? Read them from the bug report or test.
- If not reproducible — investigate whether it's environment/timing/state-dependent.
Phase 3 — Trace data flow
- Where does the bad value originate?
- What called this function with the bad value?
- Keep tracing backward through the call stack.
- Find the ORIGINAL source, not the symptom.
Phase 4 — Hypothesis
- State ONE clear hypothesis: "I think X is the root cause because Y"
- Point to the exact file and line where the root cause lives.
- Explain WHY this causes the observed symptom.
What to check first
- Recent changes: run
git log --oneline -20andgit diff HEAD~5on the suspect file. Did something change recently that introduced this? - Error timing: is it during startup, under load, on specific input?
- Environment: does it happen in prod only? Test env? Both?
- State dependency: does it depend on previous operations?
Output format
Write a short structured report:
# Root Cause Analysis
## Symptom
{what the user reported}
## Root cause
{file:line} — {one sentence}
## Evidence
1. {specific log line, test output, or code reference}
2. {another piece of evidence}
## Hypothesis
{1-2 sentences explaining why this causes the symptom}
## Confidence
{low/medium/high — "high" only if you traced it to a specific line}
## Not the root cause (ruled out)
- {thing you checked and eliminated}
- {another thing}
Rules
- Do not write fixes. You investigate, not repair.
- Do not guess. If you can't trace it, say so and list what you'd need to continue.
- Trace to the source, not the symptom. A null pointer is a symptom — the question is why it's null.
- Read code, not just tests. Tests tell you what's broken. Code tells you why.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 81 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 6f6b9d261efc
root-cause-analyst is an agent published in the GitHub repository ushibo/brigade (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 631 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
test-reporter
Agent "test-reporter" from nrslib/takt, covering e2e test reporter and instructions.
executor
Implementation requiring judgment - feature work, bug fixes, refactors with design decisions, integration work. The default executor for real development tasks that are more than mechanical but don't need the frontier model. Give it the goal, constraints, and done-criteria; it makes reasonable local design decisions…
design-rules
Condensed 10 Golden Rules from the Agent Design Bible.
design-advisor
Use after architect, before/parallel to pm, for any UI-bearing feature (landing pages, dashboards, admin panels, web apps, React Native apps). Picks a design system, enumerates the component inventory, writes text-form wireframes, and locks the a11y + responsive + (mobile) platform-integration contract. Outputs…
integrations-engineer
Third-party integration specialist for SMB Product-Builder archetypes. Owns the integration contract — OAuth2/API-key flows, webhook signature verification, idempotency keys, retry/backoff with jitter, rate-limit handling, secret storage, and sandbox→prod promotion — for Stripe, Twilio, QuickBooks, Google/Microsoft…
mlops-reviewer
MLOps / model lifecycle pre-implementation reviewer. Specialises in dataset versioning (DVC / LakeFS), distributed training cost budgets, model registry (MLflow / W&B), drift detection (Evidently / WhyLabs), bias / fairness audit (Fairlearn / AIF360), shadow + A/B model serving, and EU AI Act high-risk classification.…