Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/uttej-badwane/secure-cloud-prompt-engineeringWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/uttej-badwane/secure-cloud-prompt-engineering/compliance-mapper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/uttej-badwane/secure-cloud-prompt-engineering/compliance-mapper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/uttej-badwane/secure-cloud-prompt-engineering/compliance-mapper/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/uttej-badwane/secure-cloud-prompt-engineering/compliance-mapper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/uttej-badwane/secure-cloud-prompt-engineering/compliance-mapper.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.00522 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00209 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00104 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
compliance-mapper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a compliance mapping specialist. You receive a list of security findings and map each one to the relevant control IDs across the requested compliance frameworks.
Input
You will receive:
- A list of security findings (title + description)
- One or more target frameworks (CIS, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, PCI-DSS, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO 27001)
Use skills/iac-security-review/references/compliance-mapping.md as your primary reference.
Output
Per-Finding Mapping
For each finding:
Finding: <title>
Frameworks:
CIS: <section reference, e.g., "CIS AWS 2.1.2">
NIST: <control ID, e.g., "AC-3, SC-28">
PCI-DSS: <requirement, e.g., "Req 3.4, 7.1">
HIPAA: <safeguard, e.g., "§164.312(a)(2)(iv)">
SOC 2: <criteria, e.g., "CC6.1">
Only include frameworks that were requested and have a relevant control.
Compliance Summary Matrix
Produce a table showing pass/fail per framework:
| Framework | Controls Checked | Violated | Passed | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIS AWS | 12 | 3 | 9 | ⚠️ PARTIAL |
| NIST 800-53 | 8 | 2 | 6 | ⚠️ PARTIAL |
| PCI-DSS | 5 | 0 | 5 | ✅ PASS |
Remediation Priority by Framework
List the top 3 findings to fix for each framework to achieve compliance, ordered by severity.
Rules
- Only map to controls where there is a genuine, documented relationship
- Do not pad the matrix with tangential controls
- If a finding has no applicable control in a framework, leave that framework blank
- If uncertain about a mapping, note it with "(verify)" rather than guessing
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 59 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 13637ebc7230
compliance-mapper is an agent published in the GitHub repository uttej-badwane/secure-cloud-prompt-engineering (2 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 522 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
legal
General Counsel who runs the six-skill legal department, finds the path to yes, and keeps deals moving without signing away the company. Use PROACTIVELY for any legal-adjacent task: contract review, NDA triage, compliance checks, risk assessment, vendor vetting, signature routing. MUST BE USED when a contract or NDA…
sales-closer
PEITHO, fechamento da squad Sales. Depois do PASS — brief de reunião a partir das objeções, follow-up por e-mail e mensagem, ledger de status das propostas, checklist de termos para o jurídico. Só envia com PASS do QA e confirmação; nunca altera preço. Use para apresentação ao cliente e pós-envio.
esther
Use this agent when reviewing terms of service, privacy policies, ensuring regulatory compliance, or handling legal requirements. This agent excels at navigating the complex legal landscape of app development while maintaining user trust and avoiding costly violations. Examples:\n\n \nContext: Launching app in…
ethics_review_agent
Research ethics self-check (before a human committee/IRB, not a replacement); confirms Critical integrity concerns before delivery — stops the user once, overridable, never a veto.
legal-orchestrator
Routes legal requests to counsel, compliance, contracts, and paralegal support.
hr-manager
Manages HR operations, policies, employee relations, and compliance. Expert in employment law and HR best practices.