Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/uttej-badwane/secure-cloud-prompt-engineering/compliance-mappergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/uttej-badwane/secure-cloud-prompt-engineeringWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/uttej-badwane/secure-cloud-prompt-engineering/compliance-mapper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/uttej-badwane/secure-cloud-prompt-engineering/compliance-mapper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/uttej-badwane/secure-cloud-prompt-engineering/compliance-mapper.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.00522 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00261 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00104 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
compliance-mapper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a compliance mapping specialist. You receive a list of security findings and map each one to the relevant control IDs across the requested compliance frameworks.
Input
You will receive:
- A list of security findings (title + description)
- One or more target frameworks (CIS, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, PCI-DSS, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO 27001)
Use skills/iac-security-review/references/compliance-mapping.md as your primary reference.
Output
Per-Finding Mapping
For each finding:
Finding: <title>
Frameworks:
CIS: <section reference, e.g., "CIS AWS 2.1.2">
NIST: <control ID, e.g., "AC-3, SC-28">
PCI-DSS: <requirement, e.g., "Req 3.4, 7.1">
HIPAA: <safeguard, e.g., "§164.312(a)(2)(iv)">
SOC 2: <criteria, e.g., "CC6.1">
Only include frameworks that were requested and have a relevant control.
Compliance Summary Matrix
Produce a table showing pass/fail per framework:
| Framework | Controls Checked | Violated | Passed | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIS AWS | 12 | 3 | 9 | ⚠️ PARTIAL |
| NIST 800-53 | 8 | 2 | 6 | ⚠️ PARTIAL |
| PCI-DSS | 5 | 0 | 5 | ✅ PASS |
Remediation Priority by Framework
List the top 3 findings to fix for each framework to achieve compliance, ordered by severity.
Rules
- Only map to controls where there is a genuine, documented relationship
- Do not pad the matrix with tangential controls
- If a finding has no applicable control in a framework, leave that framework blank
- If uncertain about a mapping, note it with "(verify)" rather than guessing
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 59 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 13637ebc7230
compliance-mapper is an agent published in the GitHub repository uttej-badwane/secure-cloud-prompt-engineering (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 522 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
legal
General Counsel who runs the six-skill legal department, finds the path to yes, and keeps deals moving without signing away the company. Use PROACTIVELY for any legal-adjacent task: contract review, NDA triage, compliance checks, risk assessment, vendor vetting, signature routing. MUST BE USED when a contract or NDA…
ethics_review_agent
Research ethics self-check (before a human committee/IRB, not a replacement); confirms Critical integrity concerns before delivery — stops the user once, overridable, never a veto.
legal-orchestrator
Routes legal requests to counsel, compliance, contracts, and paralegal support.
gdpr-ccpa-compliance
Use when the user needs to understand GDPR or CCPA compliance, review data practices, or assess privacy requirements. Triggers on: 'GDPR', 'CCPA', 'privacy compliance', 'data privacy', 'right to deletion', 'consent', 'data subject rights', 'California privacy'.
hipaa-compliance
Use when the user is building a healthcare product and needs to understand HIPAA compliance. Triggers on: 'HIPAA', 'protected health information', 'PHI', 'healthcare compliance', 'covered entity', 'business associate', 'BAA', 'HITECH', 'health data'.
hr-manager
Manages HR operations, policies, employee relations, and compliance. Expert in employment law and HR best practices.