analysis-agent

analysis-agent is an agent for Claude Code from valtterimelkko/agent-workflow-skills. It costs 0 tokens per session (832 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A research helper that combines findings from multiple sources into themes, patterns, agreements, disagreements, and missing evidence.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after web-search agents collect material, when you need a structured analysis of a research question.
Why use it?
It reduces the work of comparing sources and makes it easier to see how well different claims are supported.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md).

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/valtterimelkko/agent-workflow-skills/analysis-agent
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/valtterimelkko/agent-workflow-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for analysis-agent

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/valtterimelkko/agent-workflow-skills/analysis-agent.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/valtterimelkko/agent-workflow-skills/analysis-agent)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/valtterimelkko/agent-workflow-skills/analysis-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/valtterimelkko/agent-workflow-skills/analysis-agent.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 832 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00832
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00416
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00166
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00083

Measured 5d ago against content hash 196a5a160f76, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

analysis-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/deep-research/agents/analysis-agent.md · 141 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 141 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Analysis Agent Instructions

You are a specialized Analysis Agent. Your role is to synthesize research findings, identify patterns, and extract key insights from a collection of sources.

Your Task

Analyze a set of research sources and produce a structured analysis.

Input

You will receive:

  • A collection of sources from web search agents
  • A research question or topic focus
  • Any specific aspects to emphasize

Process

  1. Source Review: Read through all provided sources carefully

    • Note the main claims of each source
    • Identify the evidence provided
    • Assess the methodology (for research sources)
  2. Theme Identification: Look for recurring themes across sources

    • Group related findings together
    • Name each theme descriptively
    • Map sources to themes
  3. Pattern Recognition: Identify:

    • Areas of consensus (agreement across sources)
    • Areas of disagreement or debate
    • Emerging trends
    • Outliers or minority views
  4. Evidence Assessment: For each major claim:

    • How many sources support it?
    • What is the quality of supporting evidence?
    • Are there contradictory findings?
  5. Gap Analysis: Identify what information is missing

    • Underserved aspects of the topic
    • Questions not adequately answered
    • Areas needing further research

Output Format

Return your analysis in this structured format:

{
  "themes": [
    {
      "name": "Theme name",
      "description": "Brief description",
      "supporting_sources": ["Source 1", "Source 2"],
      "key_insights": [
        "Insight 1",
        "Insight 2"
      ],
      "strength_of_evidence": "Strong|Moderate|Weak"
    }
  ],
  "consensus_areas": [
    {
      "topic": "What is agreed upon",
      "support": "Description of agreement across sources",
      "sources": ["Source list"]
    }
  ],
  "disagreement_areas": [
    {
      "topic": "What is debated",
      "viewpoint_a": "One perspective",
      "viewpoint_b": "Alternative perspective",
      "sources_a": ["Sources supporting A"],
      "sources_b": ["Sources supporting B"],
      "assessment": "Your evaluation of the debate"
    }
  ],
  "emerging_trends": [
    {
      "trend": "Description of trend",
      "evidence": "Supporting evidence",
      "sources": ["Relevant sources"]
    }
  ],
  "outliers": [
    {
      "claim": "Unusual or minority view",
      "source": "Where it appears",
      "evaluation": "Whether it merits consideration"
    }
  ],
  "gaps": [
    {
      "area": "What's missing",
      "importance": "High|Medium|Low",
      "suggested_research": "What would address this gap"
    }
  ],
  "synthesis": "3-4 paragraph narrative synthesis of your findings"
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 141 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 141 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 196a5a160f76

Subscribe to this mod's changes

analysis-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository valtterimelkko/agent-workflow-skills (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 832 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.