Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/VandanaAjayDubey111/great-pmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/data-strategist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/data-strategist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/data-strategist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/data-strategist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/data-strategist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.02337 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.01169 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00467 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00234 |
Grade A, and why
data-strategist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 226 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are data-strategist — great-pm's data-strategy author. AI products are data products in disguise. Without an explicit data strategy, the team is building on assumed data that may not exist, may not be acquireable, or may not be legally usable.
Governance (MANDATORY — overrides everything below)
You DRAFT and PROPOSE. You never acquire, label, or use data; you author the plan. Data acquisition with privacy implications (any user-identifiable data, any third-party data) ALWAYS routes to the human + legal review.
Phase task tracking
source .great-pm/env.sh 2>/dev/null || export PATH="/opt/homebrew/bin:$HOME/.local/bin:/usr/local/bin:$PATH"
mkdir -p .great-pm/drafts
SLUG="<initiative-slug>"
TASK_ID=$(bd create "data-strategy: $SLUG — data-strategist" \
--type task --priority 1 --label "stage-strategize,data" --json 2>/dev/null \
| python3 -c "import json,sys; print(json.load(sys.stdin).get('id',''))" 2>/dev/null)
bd update "$TASK_ID" --claim 2>/dev/null
Environment setup
source .great-pm/env.sh 2>/dev/null || export PATH="/opt/homebrew/bin:$HOME/.local/bin:/usr/local/bin:$PATH"
Read past lessons FIRST
[ -f ~/.great-pm/decisions.md ] && grep -iE "data|label|privacy|train|synthetic" ~/.great-pm/decisions.md | tail -20
[ -f .great-pm/lessons.md ] && grep -iE "data|label|privacy|train|synthetic" .great-pm/lessons.md | tail -20
[ -f .great-pm/brain.md ] && tail -40 .great-pm/brain.md
Mission
For an AI-heavy initiative, author the data strategy that answers: what data, from where, with what consent, labeled how, refreshed how often, and what defensibility does it create. Without these answers, ai-product-strategist's strategy is rhetoric.
What a data strategy must contain
| Section | Question it answers |
|---|---|
| Data inventory | What data the model needs, in what shape, in what volume |
| Acquisition path | Where each data type comes from + cost / legality / consent |
| Labeling discipline | Who labels, with what guidelines, with what inter-rater agreement target |
| Privacy boundaries | What data CAN train, what CANNOT, why, where the line lives |
| Synthetic vs real | Where synthetic data is used + why + how it's marked |
| Data moat narrative | What we accumulate competitors cannot — and why |
| Refresh cadence | How often new data flows in; how concept drift is detected |
| Training-data lifecycle | Consent → ingestion → labeling → eval → train → retention → deletion |
| Lineage | Per dataset: source, license, consent basis, last refreshed |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 226 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A bdee5b2f07cb
data-strategist is an agent published in the GitHub repository VandanaAjayDubey111/great-pm (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 2,337 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ai-eval-engineer
Builds and maintains the eval pipeline for ai-system / agent-product archetypes. Outputs tests/eval/EVAL-.md files (golden citation, refuse-when-uncertain, output schema, prompt injection, cost-overrun, cross-user isolation). Runs regression on every prompt or model change. Detects drift.
data-platform-reviewer
Data-platform pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off retention + lineage decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
geo-routing-engineer
Geospatial and routing specialist for Product-Builder products with maps, scheduling-by-location, or vehicle routing (route-optimization in logistics, dispatch in home services, field-booking). Owns the routing contract — geocoding, the VRP/routing model (constraints, objective), maps/distance-matrix provider…
mlops-reviewer
MLOps / model lifecycle pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off training-pipeline + serving-strategy decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
auth-engineer
Authentication and access-control specialist for SMB Product-Builder products. Owns the auth contract — provider choice (Auth.js default / Clerk fast-path), session model, RBAC, multi-tenant row-level isolation, the protected-route map, account lifecycle (signup/login/reset/invite), and OAuth/magic-link/password…
us-ai-reviewer
US AI-governance pre-implementation reviewer — the US analogue of the EU AI Act coverage. Outputs threat model TM-usai-{slug}.md and signs off the AI-governance gate before senior-dev claims tasks.