agentwise: Agent for Claude Code

.claude/agents/design-review-specialist.md

design-review-specialist is an agent for Claude Code from VibeCodingWithPhil/agentwise. It costs 0 tokens per session (1,740 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

An agent for checking whether a user interface matches its design and works as intended. It focuses on visual and usability checks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing screens against designs, checking UI behavior, and validating visual details.
Why use it?
It helps find layout, appearance, and interaction problems that may be missed during ordinary code testing.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

This is VibeCodingWithPhil/agentwise's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on agentwise itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything agentwise configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to VibeCodingWithPhil/agentwise. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/VibeCodingWithPhil/agentwise/main/.claude/agents/design-review-specialist.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/VibeCodingWithPhil/agentwise

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for design-review-specialist

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vibecodingwithphil/agentwise/design-review-specialist/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/vibecodingwithphil/agentwise/design-review-specialist)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vibecodingwithphil/agentwise/design-review-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vibecodingwithphil/agentwise/design-review-specialist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for design-review-specialist

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vibecodingwithphil/agentwise/design-review-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vibecodingwithphil/agentwise/design-review-specialist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,740 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.01740
Opus 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00696
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00348
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00174

Measured 1mo ago against content hash bd145a0b3b56, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

design-review-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/design-review-specialist.md · 278 lines

The source is not reproduced here

A licence we could not identify

The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 278 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A bd145a0b3b56

Subscribe to this mod's changes

design-review-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository VibeCodingWithPhil/agentwise (47 stars, last pushed 11mo ago), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,740 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

uxaudit-l4-judge

L4-journey Judge for the uxaudit pipeline. Reads the per-journey capture directory (screenshots + steps.json + evaluation brief) and writes a strict pass/fail/unverifiable verdict with four-axis journeyevaluation to result.json. Has Read, Write, Glob — no Bash, no WebFetch — physically cannot drive a browser or curl…

gotalab/uxaudit · 111 tokens

uxaudit-reconciler

Reconciler for the uxaudit pipeline. Runs after every Judge has produced a verdict. The ONLY role allowed to see both the Scout's project-context.json AND the Judges' per-check result.json files. Flips catalog FAILS to PASS in strictly enumerated cases where the project's declared design system explicitly justifies…

gotalab/uxaudit · 108 tokens

arn-spark-ux-judge

This agent should be used when the arn-spark-static-prototype skill or arn-spark-clickable-prototype skill needs an independent quality verdict on prototype artifacts. Delivers strict, evidence-based scoring of every criterion on a defined scale, determines a PASS or FAIL verdict, and provides actionable improvement…

AppsVortex/arness · 395 tokens

a11y-write-playwright-tests

Write Playwright accessibility tests for a component or page: axe scan file and keyboard-only variant. Triggers when the user asks to 'add a11y tests', 'write axe test', 'add keyboard test', or 'create accessibility test for X'.

AmadeusITGroup/otter · 59 tokens

ia-accessibility-tester

WCAG 2.1/2.2 accessibility audit: keyboard navigation, screen reader, contrast, ARIA, forms, cognitive. Use for accessibility review, WCAG compliance, or inclusive design assessment.

iliaal/whetstone · 48 tokens

release-agent

Automated release orchestration with quality gates, smoke test integration, and deployment coordination.

FortiumPartners/ensemble · 19 tokens