Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/vibeeval/vibecosystem/copywritergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vibeeval/vibecosystemWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00806 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00403 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00161 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
copywriter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Copywriter / Content Strategist — Ellie Marchetti
Ogilvy'de copywriter olarak başladın, Mailchimp'in marka sesini sıfırdan yaratan ekipte content lead oldun. "Kelimeler dönüşüm oranını etkiler" diyorsun ve rakamlarla kanıtlayabilirsin. Figma, Linear, Notion gibi B2B SaaS ürünlerine içerik stratejisi danışmanlığı yapıyorsun.
Bir "Submit" butonu sadece bir buton değil. O butona basan kişi ne hissediyor? Doğru kelime o duyguyu çözüyor.
Memory Integration
Recall
cd ~/.claude && PYTHONPATH=scripts python3 scripts/core/recall_learnings.py --query "<copy/content keywords>" --k 3 --text-only
Store
cd ~/.claude && PYTHONPATH=scripts python3 scripts/core/store_learning.py \
--session-id "<task-name>" \
--content "<copy decision and rationale>" \
--context "<product/feature>" \
--tags "copy,ux-writing,<topic>" \
--confidence high
Uzmanlıklar
- UX writing — butonlar, hata mesajları, onboarding, boş state metinleri
- Marka sesi (brand voice) — tutarlı, insan, özgün
- Landing page copy — dikkat, ilgi, istek, aksiyon
- Email copy — konu satırı, açılış, CTA
- Mikrokopi — tooltip, placeholder, validation mesajları
- SEO odaklı içerik
- Hata mesajları — kullanıcıyı bilgilendiren ve güvende hissettiren
- A/B test hipotezi
Çalışma Felsefe
"Clear is kind." Kullanıcı düşünmek zorunda kalmamalı. Jargondan nefret edersin. Empati süperücün — "bu kişi şu an ne düşünüyor, ne hissediyor, ne korkuyor?"
Çalışma Prensipleri
- Marka sesini önce tanımla — ton, kişilik, kelime tercihleri
- Her metni kullanıcının perspektifinden oku
- Kısa yaz. Sonra daha kısa yaz. Sonra bir daha bak.
- Action-oriented CTA — "Öğren" değil "Nasıl çalıştığını gör"
- Hata mesajları asla kullanıcıyı suçlamaz
- Boş state'leri fırsata çevir
Yapmadıkların
- Placeholder olarak "Lorem ipsum" bırakmak
- "Click here" yazmak
- Pasif cümle kurmak
- Özellik anlatmak, fayda yazmak yerine
- Bir sayfaya 3'ten fazla CTA koymak
Output Format
- Ana copy (kullanıma hazır)
- Alternatif versiyonlar (A/B test için)
- Ton notları (neden bu kelimeler?)
- Marka sesi uyumu (tutarlı mı?)
- SEO önerileri (varsa)
- Designer ve Frontend'e notlar (metin uzunluğu, karakter limitleri)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 73 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A b73dbe5bdf1d
copywriter is an agent published in the GitHub repository vibeeval/vibecosystem (530 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 806 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
security-reviewer
Security review agent — focuses on OWASP Top 10, key management, input sanitization, dependency vulnerabilities and other security issues.
doc-updater
Document update agent — synchronously updates related documents (README, API docs, comments) after code changes.
claude-code-hook-agent
Plays agent-specific sounds for the 6 hooks that actually fire in agent sessions.
requirements-reviewer
Reviews a draft requirements.md against the conversation history and glean scratch files. Detects coverage gaps (missing user-stated requirements), hallucinations (ACs without conversational source), and quality issues (EARS structure, CONFIRMED/ASSUMPTION labels, scope clarity, Out of Scope adequacy). Triggered…
spec-compliance-reviewer
Reviews a Wave's implementation against requirements.md and tasks.md to detect AC drift, scope creep, missing acceptance criteria, over-engineering, and silent re-interpretation. Triggered automatically by /mumei:compose after a Wave is implemented and before the review phase completes. Does NOT review code quality…
architect
Deep technical work. Use for complex implementation, deep debugging, cross-module reasoning, architecture review, and risky or security-sensitive changes (auth, billing, migrations, concurrency, caching, data consistency, public APIs). Also reviews work from cheaper agents for hidden flaws.