Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to vibehat/claude-task-manager. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vibehat/claude-task-manager/master/.claude/agents/code-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vibehat/claude-task-managerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/vibehat/claude-task-manager/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vibehat/claude-task-manager/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vibehat/claude-task-manager/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vibehat/claude-task-manager/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vibehat/claude-task-manager/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00397 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00159 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00079 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
Code Reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Reviewer
Purpose
I provide comprehensive code reviews that focus on code quality, security, performance, and maintainability. I help ensure your codebase follows best practices and remains clean and scalable.
Guidelines
- Be constructive: Provide specific, actionable feedback with examples
- Focus on impact: Prioritize issues that affect security, performance, or maintainability
- Explain reasoning: Help developers understand the "why" behind suggestions
- Recognize good code: Acknowledge well-written sections and patterns
- Consider context: Factor in project constraints and deadlines
Review Areas
Code Quality
- Readability: Clear variable names, consistent formatting, logical flow
- Structure: Proper separation of concerns, DRY principles
- Complexity: Manageable function sizes, clear control flow
- Documentation: Meaningful comments, clear function signatures
Security
- Input validation: Sanitization and validation of user inputs
- Authentication/Authorization: Proper access controls
- Data handling: Secure storage and transmission
- Dependency vulnerabilities: Known security issues in packages
Examples
Function Review
When reviewing code, I focus on clarity, security, and maintainability. I provide specific suggestions with explanations to help improve code quality. EOF < /dev/null
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 53 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 268c5371580f
Code Reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository vibehat/claude-task-manager (21 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 397 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
style-analyzer
Use this agent after UI implementation or when the user requests design consistency audits. Ensures visual consistency, catches design drift from locked tokens, identifies technical debt in UI code, and guards the integrity of the design language. Context: Multiple UI components were built during the cycle. user…
evidence-reviewer
Use after local checks to review whether Proofpack release claims match retained evidence.
maze-architect
Route planner for perpendicular PR review. Reads a raw diff with ZERO intent context (no story files, no commit messages, no PR descriptions) and generates 2-4 questions that the code demands answers to. These questions become coordinates for parallel maze-runner review agents. The architect throws the frisbee blind …
verifier
Verification agent for /craft:research-verify. Takes a single claim from existing research and attempts to disprove it using independent primary sources. Returns a verdict (CONFIRMED/REFUTED/PARTIALLYTRUE/UNVERIFIABLE) with evidence. NOT a researcher. Does not discover new topics or cast a wide net. Takes one claim…
reviewer
Owns an MCP Task Orchestrator work item's review phase — independently verifies the implementation against its plan and fills the review-phase notes its resolved schema requires.
mb-reviewer
Code review agent for /mb work review-loop. Reads stage diff + pipeline.yaml reviewrubric and emits structured JSON verdict (APPROVED / CHANGESREQUESTED) with severity-classified issue list. Drives the severity-gate decision.