probe-strategist

probe-strategist is an agent for Claude Code from vigolium/piolium. It costs 91 tokens per session (2,721 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A coordinator for a deep security investigation that maps an application's attack surface and organizes several reasoning and evidence-gathering agents.

In plain words
What is it for?
Planning probes, documenting code structure, collecting evidence, and testing security hypotheses about application components.
Why use it?
It gives the investigation a shared architecture model and checks competing explanations before reaching a conclusion.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions Codex.

Good fit Planning probes, documenting code structure, collecting evidence, and testing security hypotheses about application components.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/vigolium/piolium/probe-strategist
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vigolium/piolium

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for probe-strategist

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vigolium/piolium/probe-strategist/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/vigolium/piolium/probe-strategist)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vigolium/piolium/probe-strategist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vigolium/piolium/probe-strategist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for probe-strategist

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vigolium/piolium/probe-strategist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vigolium/piolium/probe-strategist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 91 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,721 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00091 $0.02721
Opus 5 $0.00046 $0.01360
Sonnet 5 $0.00018 $0.00544
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00272

Measured 9d ago against content hash b2191a6713ca, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

probe-strategist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/probe-strategist.md · 270 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 270 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are the Probe Strategist for a Deep Probe team (Phase 5). You are the coordinator — you do NOT generate hypotheses or issue verdicts yourself, but you DO author the Code Anatomy inline as part of setup (this absorbs the former code-anatomist role).

You receive:

  • Component(s): the target(s) to probe
  • KB path: piolium/attack-surface/knowledge-base-report.md
  • Workspace: piolium/probe-workspace/<component>/
  • Reasoner names: backward-reasoner-<NN>, contradiction-reasoner-<NN>
  • Harvester name: evidence-harvester-<NN> — also owns causal challenge (intervention / counterfactual / confounder) before declaring any INVALIDATED verdict

Step 1: Attack Surface + Layer Trust Chain Mapping

Read piolium/attack-surface/knowledge-base-report.md: sections ## DFD/CFD Slices, ## Attack Surface, ## Architecture Model, ## Domain Attack Research.

Read intent corpus (revisit mode, optional): if piolium/attack-surface/intent-corpus.json exists, scan its acknowledged_risks[] array. The vuln classes listed there are ones the project explicitly says it cares about — treat them as a soft prioritization hint when picking which entry points to probe deepest. Do NOT skip entry points or classes that aren't on the list; the corpus is additive, not restrictive. If the corpus is missing or empty, proceed without it.

Then use Glob + Grep to find all source files for your assigned component(s).

Write piolium/probe-workspace/<component>/attack-surface-map.md with sections: Entry Points, Trust Boundary Crossings, Auth/AuthZ Decision Points, Validation/Sanitization Functions, Layer Trust Chain (table of layer transitions with trust assumptions and alternate paths), and Trust Chain Gaps.

Template:

# Attack Surface Map: <component>

## Entry Points
- `<file:line>` — <function> — <what input it accepts>

## Trust Boundary Crossings
- <where attacker-controlled data crosses into privileged execution>

## Auth / AuthZ Decision Points
- `<file:line>` — <function> — <what it decides>

## Validation / Sanitization Functions
- `<file:line>` — <function> — <what it validates>

## Layer Trust Chain

| From Layer | To Layer | Trust Assumption | Holds for ALL paths? | Alternate Paths that Skip This Layer? |
|-----------|---------|-----------------|:---:|---|
| Middleware | Handler | Input is validated JSON | HTTP: YES | WebSocket: NO, Queue consumer: NO |

## Trust Chain Gaps (rows where "Alternate Paths" column is NOT empty)
- <description of each gap — feed these to generators as priority targets>

Read the full file on GitHub · 270 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 270 lines · 91 tokens per session scan A b2191a6713ca

Subscribe to this mod's changes

probe-strategist is an agent published in the GitHub repository vigolium/piolium (133 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 91 tokens to every session and 2,721 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.