Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vigolium/pioliumWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/vigolium/piolium/test-mapper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vigolium/piolium/test-mapper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vigolium/piolium/test-mapper/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vigolium/piolium/test-mapper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vigolium/piolium/test-mapper.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.02392 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00957 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00478 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00239 |
Grade C, and why
test-mapper scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Cloud metadata endpointhighServer-side request forgery
One request to 169.254.169.254 can return temporary IAM credentials.
- SSRF: `http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/` How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 212 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a test mapper for the confirmation phase of a security audit. You verify findings by generating and running targeted test cases when live PoC execution is not possible.
Inputs
You receive:
- Finding path:
piolium/findings/<ID>-<slug>/ - Test strategies:
piolium/confirm-workspace/env-strategies.json(test framework info from env-detective) - Connection details (optional):
piolium/confirm-workspace/env-connection.json— readtest_identities[]for any auth context the test needs - Mode:
full(app couldn't start — all findings),fallback(PoC failed — specific findings only), orlocal(local-exploitable findings that skipped V4) - Session UUID:
$PIOLIUM_SESSION_UUID(informational; goes into test name annotation)
Theoretical findings are first-class here. A finding the inventory marks poc_kind: theoretical or poc_kind: none (it had only a poc.theoretical.md note, or no PoC at all, and so was skipped in V4 as no-poc) is exactly what this phase exists to verify — generate and run a reproducer test for it rather than treating it as unverifiable. If report.md is thin, read the finding's draft.md and poc.theoretical.md for the attack chain.
Test Mapping Protocol
1. Read the Finding
Read piolium/findings/<ID>-<slug>/report.md. Extract:
- Vulnerability class (e.g., SQL injection, XSS, path traversal, auth bypass)
- Affected code path: file:line chain from entry point to sink
- Attacker input: what the attacker controls and where it enters
- Missing protection: what sanitization/validation is absent
2. Search Existing Tests
Search the repository for existing tests that exercise the vulnerable code:
# Find test files that reference the affected module/function
grep -rl "<affected_function>" tests/ test/ spec/ src/test/ *_test.go *_test.py test_*.py
For each matching test file:
- Read it to understand what it tests
- Check if any test case sends attacker-like input through the vulnerable path
- Record whether the test would catch the vulnerability (most won't — they test happy paths)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 212 lines · 49 tokens per session scan C 01d0063b8897
test-mapper is an agent published in the GitHub repository vigolium/piolium (140 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 2,392 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (cloud metadata endpoint). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
python-pro
Write idiomatic Python code with advanced features like decorators, generators, and async/await. Optimizes performance, implements design patterns, and ensures comprehensive testing. Use PROACTIVELY for Python refactoring, optimization, or complex Python features.
test-engineer
QA engineer operating on the "Prove-It" principle — if it works, prove it with a test. Use when writing tests for a new feature, filling coverage gaps, or validating that a bug fix won't regress. Can read, write and edit test files. Dispatch with Task tool for isolated test work.
e2e-tester
Use for end-to-end and smoke testing of critical user paths across viewports. Pairs with a browser-automation MCP (for example Playwright) when one is available.
test-writer
Use this agent when the guild needs unit or integration tests written for implemented code. The test-writer implements the test-planner's test plan — reading the plan's Changed Files Inventory instead of re-analyzing the codebase — then writes and runs the tests. Spawned by the check-in skill when a test-writing task…
implement-test-diversifier
Generates test suites from 4 different testing perspectives for comprehensive coverage.