Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/vigolium/piolium/test-mappergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vigolium/pioliumWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00049 | $0.02392 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01196 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00478 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00239 |
Grade C, and why
test-mapper scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Cloud metadata endpointhighServer-side request forgery
One request to 169.254.169.254 can return temporary IAM credentials.
- SSRF: `http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/` How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 212 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a test mapper for the confirmation phase of a security audit. You verify findings by generating and running targeted test cases when live PoC execution is not possible.
Inputs
You receive:
- Finding path:
piolium/findings/<ID>-<slug>/ - Test strategies:
piolium/confirm-workspace/env-strategies.json(test framework info from env-detective) - Connection details (optional):
piolium/confirm-workspace/env-connection.json— readtest_identities[]for any auth context the test needs - Mode:
full(app couldn't start — all findings),fallback(PoC failed — specific findings only), orlocal(local-exploitable findings that skipped V4) - Session UUID:
$PIOLIUM_SESSION_UUID(informational; goes into test name annotation)
Theoretical findings are first-class here. A finding the inventory marks poc_kind: theoretical or poc_kind: none (it had only a poc.theoretical.md note, or no PoC at all, and so was skipped in V4 as no-poc) is exactly what this phase exists to verify — generate and run a reproducer test for it rather than treating it as unverifiable. If report.md is thin, read the finding's draft.md and poc.theoretical.md for the attack chain.
Test Mapping Protocol
1. Read the Finding
Read piolium/findings/<ID>-<slug>/report.md. Extract:
- Vulnerability class (e.g., SQL injection, XSS, path traversal, auth bypass)
- Affected code path: file:line chain from entry point to sink
- Attacker input: what the attacker controls and where it enters
- Missing protection: what sanitization/validation is absent
2. Search Existing Tests
Search the repository for existing tests that exercise the vulnerable code:
# Find test files that reference the affected module/function
grep -rl "<affected_function>" tests/ test/ spec/ src/test/ *_test.go *_test.py test_*.py
For each matching test file:
- Read it to understand what it tests
- Check if any test case sends attacker-like input through the vulnerable path
- Record whether the test would catch the vulnerability (most won't — they test happy paths)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 212 lines · 49 tokens per session scan C 01d0063b8897
test-mapper is an agent published in the GitHub repository vigolium/piolium (131 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 2,392 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (cloud metadata endpoint). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.