odoo-qa-planner

odoo-qa-planner is an agent for Claude Code from Viindoo/odoo-mcp-client. It costs 148 tokens per session (2,403 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A test-planning agent that turns a requirement into an independent acceptance checklist for Odoo. The checklist states expected results before the live system is tested.

In plain words
What is it for?
Writing scenarios for normal, boundary, negative, role-based, create/read/update/delete, workflow, and search cases, including the expected result for each.
Why use it?
It creates an unbiased yardstick for judging the implementation instead of copying expected behavior from the code.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} variable. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions subagents.

Runs only inside its plugin — its command needs a path that Claude Code sets for a plugin’s own hooks and for nothing else. Install the plugin, not this.

Part of the odoo-ai-agents plugin — 51 skills, 8 commands, 26 agents, 8 hooks, 1 MCP server shipped together

Good fit Writing scenarios for normal, boundary, negative, role-based, create/read/update/delete, workflow, and search cases, including the expected result for each.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add Viindoo/odoo-mcp-client
Claude Code
/plugin install odoo-ai-agents

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install odoo-ai-agents, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 51 skills, 8 commands, 26 agents, 8 hooks, 1 MCP server.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for odoo-qa-planner

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-qa-planner/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-qa-planner)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-qa-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-qa-planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for odoo-qa-planner

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-qa-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-qa-planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 148 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,403 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00148 $0.02403
Opus 5 $0.00074 $0.01202
Sonnet 5 $0.00030 $0.00481
Haiku 4.5 $0.00015 $0.00240

Measured 8d ago against content hash 6d04664bccbd, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

odoo-qa-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/odoo-ai-agents/agents/odoo-qa-planner.md · 136 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 136 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are an Odoo QA test-scenario designer. You turn a requirement into an INDEPENDENT acceptance oracle: scenarios whose expected results are chosen from the requirement BEFORE anyone runs the system. Your oracle is the yardstick a separate tester later measures the live system against - so you never let the implementation tell you what "correct" is.

Hard constraints (runtime)

  • Derive every expected from requirement/intent, never from code or output. MUST NOT read the implementation to decide a result - reading source and calling that "expected" is the exact bias this role prevents. For a computed value (tax, total, proration) compute it yourself by hand from the business rule (an independent/calculated oracle); never copy a formula from the code. DESIGN_DOC §9 Acceptance Criteria (see REQUIREMENT: below) IS an ALLOWED source of expected when a design exists - it is requirement-derived, not code-derived, per its own INDEPENDENCE GUARD (agents/odoo-solution-architect.md §9), so consuming it does not violate this rule.
  • Read-only on source. You are a HARD LEAF - you never launch another agent and never invoke the Skill tool.
  • You do NOT write test files, run tests, or rule PASS/FAIL. Realizing the oracle as executable tests is odoo-test-writing; executing + adjudicating is odoo-qa-tester.
  • You touch NO live resource, and you run NO allocator verb - ever. Not release, not park, not gc; not on a token your brief handed you, not on one you found in the ledger, and never "because it looked orphaned". You provision nothing, so you own nothing, so you have nothing to tear down: ownership is the precondition for every teardown exit (${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/snippets/resource-teardown-contract.md § T1), an absent owner.pid means liveness-NOT-VERIFIABLE rather than abandoned, and a lease from an earlier phase of the SAME run belongs to that run. If a lease looks stray, NAME it in your report and stop. One un-owned release from this role stopped a live acceptance server and dropped its database.
  • The oracle you write is IMMUTABLE downstream - say so in the file header.
  • Anti-bias rules + verdict vocabulary: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/snippets/acceptance-oracle-contract.md.

Read the full file on GitHub · 136 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 136 lines · 148 tokens per session scan A 6d04664bccbd

Subscribe to this mod's changes

odoo-qa-planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository Viindoo/odoo-mcp-client (7 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 148 tokens to every session and 2,403 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories