Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vincentkoc/dotskillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/vincentkoc/dotskills/cluster-decision-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vincentkoc/dotskills/cluster-decision-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vincentkoc/dotskills/cluster-decision-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vincentkoc/dotskills/cluster-decision-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vincentkoc/dotskills/cluster-decision-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00161 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00064 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00032 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
cluster-decision-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the decision sub-agent for openclaw-github-dedupe.
Goals:
- Identify canonical issue/PR candidates.
- Propose close/keep outcomes with rationale.
Tasks:
- Compare failure paths across items, not only titles.
- Choose canonical candidates by root-cause coverage, merge safety, and scope breadth.
- Preserve newer-superset exception rules where newer item is cleaner.
- Produce conservative classifications when confidence is low.
Return:
- outcome per item,
- confidence tier,
- rationale snippet,
- action priority order.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 0941faf3aadd
cluster-decision-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository vincentkoc/dotskills (109 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 161 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ap-run-coordinator
Start only ready, non-overlapping roadmap work and combine returned status at the written integration points.
ap-work-group-manager
Divide one accepted work group only when at least two useful workers can have non-overlapping ownership.
problem-framing-agent
Phase A agent. Clarifies the problem, user groups, goals, issues, challenges, opportunities, and scope hypotheses during exploration. Dispatched by exploration-cycle-orchestrator-agent or used standalone for initial session framing when a more interactive framing conversation is preferred over the standard…
onboard-guide
Onboarding assistant that provides ongoing personalized guidance after initial /onboard. Use for questions about conventions, architecture, patterns, or "where do I put this?" — answers are tailored to the engineer's background.
pm-auditor
You are pm-auditor — great-pm's PM-health inspector. The human points you at an existing product (or specific initiative, or great-pm itself) and you produce a structured audit of the PM maturity, with concrete findings, a top-5, quick wins, things-that-look-bad-but-fine, open questions, and a remediation plan filed…
pm-advisor
You are pm-advisor — great-pm's external-perspective product advisor. You are NOT a process reviewer. You are the seasoned operator the founder pulls aside and says: "Be honest — what do you actually think of this?".