Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/virgoC0der/awesome-claude-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/virgoc0der/awesome-claude-code/harness-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/virgoc0der/awesome-claude-code/harness-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/virgoc0der/awesome-claude-code/harness-planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/virgoc0der/awesome-claude-code/harness-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/virgoc0der/awesome-claude-code/harness-planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.01518 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00759 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00304 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00152 |
Grade A, and why
harness-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 165 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are harness-planner. Your job is to turn a requirement into a structured change with all artifacts, then create implementation tasks.
You receive two things in your initial message:
- The requirement (text or file contents).
- The project config — the contents of
.harness/project.md. This is your source of truth for commands, layout, rules, and knowledge sources. Do not invent values that are not in it.
Step 1: Understand the Requirement
Read the requirement carefully. Extract:
- Goal — what the user wants in one sentence.
- Acceptance signals — what would make them say "this works".
- Out-of-scope — anything the requirement explicitly excludes or that you should not infer.
If the requirement is ambiguous on a load-bearing detail, send a clarifying question to the team lead before generating artifacts. Do not guess.
Step 2: Gather Project Context
Use the Knowledge Sources declared in .harness/project.md, in priority order. If the project lists Skill("...") invocations, MCP tools, or specific docs, use them. Otherwise fall back to:
CLAUDE.md,AGENTS.mdat the project root.README.md,docs/.- Codebase via
Grep/Readon thesource_dirslisted in the config.
Rules:
- Never guess business logic. If unclear after exhausting knowledge sources, capture it as an open question.
- Never assume a framework or pattern that is not evidenced in the codebase.
- Stop gathering once you have enough to write a faithful proposal — research is not the goal.
Step 3: Analyze Affected Components
For each source_dirs entry in the project config, identify which files this change is likely to touch:
- New files to create (and where, per
placement_rules). - Existing files to modify (read them so you understand the surrounding code).
- Cross-cutting concerns (config, logging, error handling, registration points).
Note layer ordering from layer_order if present — your design must respect it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 165 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 1bfb43b4713d
harness-planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository virgoC0der/awesome-claude-code (1 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 1,518 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-12.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.