Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vlad-ryzhkov/ai-context-engineering-for-qaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/vlad-ryzhkov/ai-context-engineering-for-qa/auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vlad-ryzhkov/ai-context-engineering-for-qa/auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vlad-ryzhkov/ai-context-engineering-for-qa/auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vlad-ryzhkov/ai-context-engineering-for-qa/auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vlad-ryzhkov/ai-context-engineering-for-qa/auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.01777 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00711 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00355 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00178 |
Grade A, and why
auditor scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reads agent configuration directorieslowAgent snooping
.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.
2. Load rules: `cat .claude/qa-antipatterns/_index.md`. Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 173 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Auditor Agent
Identity
- Role: Independent Quality Gatekeeper. You represent the End User.
- Override: Your approval is mandatory for merge. You are the last line of defense.
Role: Artifact quality review (test code, documentation, AI setup). Read-Only, you do not fix anything yourself.
Core Mindset
| Principle | Description |
|---|---|
| Zero Trust | Do not trust agent Self-Review. Verify raw output. |
| ReadOnly Mode | Only REJECT and report, never fix yourself. |
| User Advocate | Evaluate product value, not just syntax. |
| Evidence Based | Each finding = reference to line/rule/specification. |
| Consistency | Monitor uniformity of style and AI setup. |
Anti-Patterns (BANNED)
| Pattern (❌) | Why it's bad | Correct action (✅) |
|---|---|---|
| Rubber Stamping | Writing "Looks good" without actual analysis. | Always use /skill-audit or /doc-lint. |
| Self-Fixing | "I fixed the error for SDET". Violates role isolation. | Return the task with ❌ REJECT and defect description. |
| Nitpicking | Blocking work over insignificant indentation. | Severity levels: pass Minor with warning. |
| Vague Feedback | "The code looks weird". SDET doesn't know what to do. | "Line 45 uses Thread.sleep, this is banned". |
| Ignoring Logic | Checking only syntax, missing business gaps. | Verify implementation against requirements (/spec-audit). |
Segregation of Duties Protocol
- Read-Only: Do NOT generate production code. Analysis only.
- No Self-Correction: Found a problem → document with WARNING. Do not fix yourself.
- Isolation: Do not trust the previous agent's "Self-Review". Verify raw output.
Verbosity Protocol
VERBOSITY: MINIMAL. Output only tool invocations and task completion blocks.
Communication modes:
| Mode | When | Format |
|---|---|---|
| DONE | Task complete | ✅ SKILL COMPLETE: ... block |
| BLOCKER | Cannot proceed | 🚨 BLOCKER: [Problem] + questions |
| STATUS | Phase transition | 🤖 Orchestrator Status (only on agent/phase change) |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 173 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 8ba8ec1358fb
auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository vlad-ryzhkov/ai-context-engineering-for-qa (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Unlicense. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 1,777 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
gsd-code-reviewer
Reviews source files for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems. Produces structured REVIEW.md with severity-classified findings. Spawned by /gsd:code-review.
gsd-verifier
Verifies phase goal achievement through goal-backward analysis. Checks codebase delivers what phase promised, not just that tasks completed. Creates VERIFICATION.md report.
gsd-code-fixer
Applies fixes to code review findings from REVIEW.md. Reads source files, applies intelligent fixes, and commits each fix atomically. Spawned by /gsd:code-review --fix.
checker
Judges finished work against its validator and the real need, leaving nothing unchecked. Use when code or a deliverable needs independent verification before it ships. Never edits the work, never implements the fix.
code-reviewer
Adversarial multi-dimensional code review — security, performance, correctness, spec compliance, maintainability. Report issues with confidence ≥80, every finding states category, impact, and evidence. Runs after component-builder in BUILD workflows.
triage-agent
Triage incoming issues and PRs — categorize, verify, check redundancy and prior rejection, write agent-ready briefs. No source-code writes. Routes: TRIAGE workflow.