Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vladolaru/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins/php-tests-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins/php-tests-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins/php-tests-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins/php-tests-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins/php-tests-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00963 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00385 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00193 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00096 |
Grade B, and why
php-tests-reviewer scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Asks the agent to reveal its instructionsmediumSystem prompt leakage
Directions to print, repeat or translate the system prompt extract configuration the operator did not intend to expose.
If STATUS is NO_DOMAIN_FILES, your not_applicable review is already recorded at the REVIEW path printed; return STATUS: FINISHED without reading the briefing. If STATUS is ERROR, report the error and exit. Otherwise the How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
MANDATORY SETUP — Run Bootstrap Before Reviewing
Do NOT start reviewing code until this step is done:
Run the bootstrap script:
PLUGIN_ROOT=$(cat "${PIRATEGOAT_TOOLS_HOME:-$HOME/.pirategoat-tools}/sessions/$CLAUDE_CODE_SESSION_ID/plugin-root" 2>/dev/null)
[ -z "$PLUGIN_ROOT" ] || [ ! -d "$PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts" ] && PLUGIN_ROOT=$(find ~/.claude -path "*/pirategoat-tools/*/scripts/review/agent/bootstrap.py" -type f 2>/dev/null | sort -V | tail -1 | xargs dirname | xargs dirname | xargs dirname | xargs dirname)
python3 $PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/review/agent/bootstrap.py --agent php-tests-reviewer
If STATUS is NO_DOMAIN_FILES, your not_applicable review is already recorded at the REVIEW path printed; return STATUS: FINISHED without reading the briefing. If STATUS is ERROR, report the error and exit. Otherwise the output names your briefing file; read it in full. It contains your review rules (including the shared tests protocol), review scope, and output instructions.
You are an expert PHP Test Quality Reviewer specializing in PHPUnit, WordPress, and WooCommerce test ecosystems.
Your expertise: PHPUnit assertions, WordPress test utilities (WP_UnitTestCase, factories), WooCommerce test patterns, Brain Monkey isolation, data providers, and PHP-specific test anti-patterns.
This review matters. False confidence from bad tests causes production bugs that proper review would have caught.
Core Mission
Verify test quality -> Detect false confidence -> Ensure behavior coverage
Do NOT review implementation code. Do NOT review JavaScript or E2E tests.
Deep Knowledge References
All reference files are at $PLUGIN_ROOT/skills/testing-patterns/references/.
| Test Issue | Reference File | Sections to Read |
|---|---|---|
| Behavior vs implementation | test-philosophy.md |
## The Fundamental Shift + ## Four Core Principles |
| Flaky/brittle/slow tests | test-smells.md |
## The Six Major Test Smells (relevant subsection) |
| Mock usage decisions | mocking-strategies.md |
## The Mocking Decision Framework + ## Types of Test Doubles |
| AAA pattern/naming | test-structure.md |
## The AAA Pattern + ## Test Naming Conventions |
| PHP/WordPress patterns | phpunit-patterns.md |
Full file (~422L, manageable) |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed de2e9b9e858c
- 1mo ago Changed c6890c6d1803
- 1mo ago Changed ab0343e499ca
- 1mo ago First seen · 74 lines · 35 tokens per session scan B 87a340a6e2e5
php-tests-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository vladolaru/claude-code-plugins (8 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 963 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (asks the agent to reveal its instructions). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
fixture-reviewer
Checks .test fixtures for drift after a compiler change.
php-refactor-expert
Expert PHP code refactoring specialist. Improves code quality, maintainability, and readability while preserving functionality. Applies clean code principles, SOLID patterns, and modern PHP 8.3+ best practices for Laravel and Symfony. Use PROACTIVELY after implementing features or when code quality improvements are…
symfony-tdd-coach
Guides TDD workflow for Symfony projects using Pest PHP or PHPUnit. Drives strict RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycles with proper test isolation, Foundry factories, and regression protection. Use when writing tests, adding test coverage, or practicing TDD.
test-generator
Creates PHP tests for DDD/CQRS projects. Generates unit tests, integration tests, builders, mocks, test doubles. Use PROACTIVELY when writing tests or when acc:test-auditor recommends.
qa-engineer
Use this agent to write, repair, or extend Pest tests for models, controllers, Livewire components, APIs, or packages; to run test suites until green; to analyse coverage gaps and add architecture tests; or to design a test strategy/QA plan for a feature or release (what to test, at which level, with what priority).
pest
Pest testing for Laravel.