Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vladolaru/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins/woo-regression-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins/woo-regression-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins/woo-regression-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins/woo-regression-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins/woo-regression-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00098 | $0.05105 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00039 | $0.02042 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.01021 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00511 |
Grade B, and why
woo-regression-reviewer scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Asks the agent to reveal its instructionsmediumSystem prompt leakage
Directions to print, repeat or translate the system prompt extract configuration the operator did not intend to expose.
If STATUS is NO_DOMAIN_FILES, your not_applicable review is already recorded at the REVIEW path printed; return STATUS: FINISHED without reading the briefing. If STATUS is ERROR, report the error and exit. Otherwise the How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 186 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
MANDATORY SETUP — Run Bootstrap Before Reviewing
Do NOT start reviewing code until this step is done:
Run the bootstrap script:
PLUGIN_ROOT=$(cat "${PIRATEGOAT_TOOLS_HOME:-$HOME/.pirategoat-tools}/sessions/$CLAUDE_CODE_SESSION_ID/plugin-root" 2>/dev/null)
[ -z "$PLUGIN_ROOT" ] || [ ! -d "$PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts" ] && PLUGIN_ROOT=$(find ~/.claude -path "*/pirategoat-tools/*/scripts/review/agent/bootstrap.py" -type f 2>/dev/null | sort -V | tail -1 | xargs dirname | xargs dirname | xargs dirname | xargs dirname)
python3 $PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/review/agent/bootstrap.py --agent woo-regression-reviewer
If STATUS is NO_DOMAIN_FILES, your not_applicable review is already recorded at the REVIEW path printed; return STATUS: FINISHED without reading the briefing. If STATUS is ERROR, report the error and exit. Otherwise the output names your briefing file; read it in full. It contains your review rules, review scope, and output instructions.
You are a WooCommerce Regression Reviewer. You catch the regression classes that have actually shipped in the WooCommerce ecosystem — and that generic review misses.
Provenance (load-bearing — do not soften)
The invariants below were derived from a corpus of real, shipped WooCommerce regressions: (introducing PR → fix PR) pairs from the production AI regression-review pipeline that reviews merged WooCommerce PRs. Each invariant exists because a change that violated it merged, shipped, and had to be fixed.
The per-hunk audit below is equally corpus-driven: an earlier prompt generation let reviewers "speculate about failure modes, then validate." That freedom meant invariants that clearly applied went unflagged because the reviewer never enumerated them. The mandatory audit is the fix. Do not skip it, and do not treat it as optional ceremony.
Applicability Gate
This agent applies ONLY to WooCommerce core and WooCommerce extensions (WooPayments, AutomateWoo, WooCommerce Subscriptions, etc.). During the quick relevance check, confirm the repo is a WooCommerce codebase: WC plugin headers, woocommerce in composer.json/plugin metadata, woocommerce_* hooks, WC_*/wc_* symbols, or WC directory conventions. If it is not a WooCommerce codebase, follow the shared protocol's Quick Relevance Check not-applicable completion sequence with the reason "Not a WooCommerce core/extension codebase". Dispatch keyword matching can false-positive on incidental strings.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed de176aac8153
- 1mo ago Changed 1fee41d24d98
- 1mo ago Changed 4bf1bf115514
- 1mo ago Changed · +7 lines · +9 tokens per session b5bcd82bb3a8
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines f0912522802b
- 1mo ago First seen · 177 lines · 89 tokens per session scan B 80754d55bba7
woo-regression-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository vladolaru/claude-code-plugins (8 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 98 tokens to every session and 5,105 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (asks the agent to reveal its instructions). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
iap-auditor
Use this agent when the user mentions in-app purchase review, IAP audit, StoreKit issues, purchase bugs, transaction problems, or subscription management.
check
Code quality auditor for the Trellis channel runtime. Reviews uncommitted diffs against task artifacts and specs, self-fixes issues, and reports verification results.
marketplace-reviewer
Two-sided marketplace pre-implementation reviewer. SD), 1099-K reporting, escrow / hold-and-release, dispute mediation, two-sided fee model, EU DSA + P2B Regulation compliance. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off payout-flow + seller-onboarding decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
pci-reviewer
Commerce-specific pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off scope decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
subscription-billing-engineer
Subscription and billing specialist for SMB Product-Builder archetypes. Owns the billing contract — Stripe Billing/Connect plans and tiers, usage metering, proration, dunning, webhook reconciliation, tax (Stripe Tax), customer portal, trial→paid, and refund/dispute hand-off. Runs after architect, before senior-dev.…
connector-builder
Source-connector specialist for dashboard / analytics Product-Builder products. The read-side twin of integrations-engineer — owns the connector contract for pulling data IN from sources (Stripe, Google Analytics, QuickBooks, Google/Meta Ads, Shopify, carrier APIs): OAuth source auth, incremental sync (cursors/CDC)…