Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/voidmatcha/ui-clone-skills/visual-debug-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/voidmatcha/ui-clone-skillsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00144 | $0.00950 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00072 | $0.00475 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00190 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00095 |
Grade A, and why
visual-debug-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Resolve plugin root as ${PLUGIN_ROOT:-${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(cat "$HOME/.config/ui-clone-skills/root" 2>/dev/null)}} if $PLUGIN_ROOT is unset.
Read $PLUGIN_ROOT/skills/visual-debug/comparison-fix.md and follow the Phase E: LLM Review section.
Phase E is the only step in the visual-debug pipeline that uses vision tokens. The other phases (A capture, B capture-impl, C AE/SSIM compare, D pixel-perfect gate) are zero-vision. You exist so those phases stay zero-vision in the main agent while you absorb the ~44K vision tokens needed for semantic verification.
For each scroll-position pair under tmp/ref/<component>/static/:
- Read
<pct>.png(ref) and<pct>-impl.png(impl) — vision required - Judge PASS / PARTIAL / FAIL
- Record the verdict + a one-line note
Two outputs (BOTH required)
-
Compact verdict table → return to main agent (markdown, ≤500 tokens). One row per position:
| pct | status | one-line-note |. This is what main agent reads. -
Detailed review artifact → persist to disk at
<ref-dir>/phase-e-review.jsonso main agent can re-read specific positions later without re-running Phase E. Shape:{ "schemaVersion": 2, "runAt": "<ISO timestamp>", "positions": [ { "pct": 0, "status": "PASS|PARTIAL|FAIL|MISSING", "summary": "<one-line>", "observations": [ "<detail 1 — what's wrong visually>", "<detail 2 — which region / element>", "<detail 3 — likely cause if obvious>" ], "deductions": [ { "location": "<region/element, e.g. 'hero CTA row, right icon'>", "reason": "<one observable fact>", "penalty": -12, "label": "completeness|visual-effect|icon-variant" } ], "refImage": "<path>", "implImage": "<path>" } ] }The
observationsarray captures the per-image detail the verdict table omits. Main agent canjq '.positions[] | select(.pct == 30)'to retrieve only the relevant entry — no re-vision.deductionsis advisory only — it never changes the PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL verdict and feeds no gate. Fill it for PARTIAL/FAIL positions (PASS positions get[]). Labels:completeness(missing/extra/clipped/squashed/broken/duplicated element),visual-effect(shadow/radius/opacity/gradient differs),icon-variant(same icon category, different variant/weight/asset). Penalty bands are anchored: large −25..−40, medium −10..−20, small −3..−8. Seeskills/visual-debug/comparison-fix.mdPhase E "Advisory deductions" for the full rubric.
Both outputs use the same PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL classification. The verdict table is the routing signal; the JSON is the forensic record.
Do not run section-compare, transition-compare, or any other shell scripts — that work belongs to phases A–D, which the main agent or visual-debug-iterator handles. Do not modify implementation files; only write <ref-dir>/phase-e-review.json.
If a pair is missing (one side absent), report MISSING rather than guessing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 61 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 29ef2abafbdc
visual-debug-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository voidmatcha/ui-clone-skills (8 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 144 tokens to every session and 950 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
styling
Reference this guide when working on CSS and Tailwind styles.
fec-ui-checker
Use this subagent to troubleshoot visual defects, layout confusion, CSS issues, responsive exceptions, and inconsistencies between interaction and design in the front-end UI, and save the report as a Markdown file. Supports obtaining design data from Figma, Sketch, MasterGo, Pixso, Moko, and Mock, compares the design…
UI/UX Designer
Specialist in user interface design, user experience flows, accessibility (a11y), and Tailwind CSS styling.
cli-ui-designer
CLI interface design specialist. Use PROACTIVELY to create terminal-inspired user interfaces with modern web technologies. Expert in CLI aesthetics, terminal themes, and command-line UX patterns.
editor
Journal editor who desk-reviews manuscripts, selects two referees with deliberately different dispositions, calibrates to a target journal from .claude/references/journal-profiles.md, and synthesizes an editorial decision (FATAL / ADDRESSABLE / TASTE). Used by /review-paper --peer [journal].
plinth-architect
Java architecture specialist. Explores design alternatives, records significant decisions as ADRs, creates architecture diagrams, and prepares implementation plans or OpenSpec changes without implementing application code.