Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add voidmatcha/ui-clone-skills/plugin install ui-clone-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/voidmatcha/ui-clone-skills/visual-debug-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/voidmatcha/ui-clone-skills/visual-debug-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/voidmatcha/ui-clone-skills/visual-debug-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/voidmatcha/ui-clone-skills/visual-debug-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/voidmatcha/ui-clone-skills/visual-debug-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01099 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00440 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00220 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00110 |
Grade A, and why
visual-debug-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Resolve plugin root as ${PLUGIN_ROOT:-${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(cat "$HOME/.config/ui-clone-skills/root" 2>/dev/null)}} if $PLUGIN_ROOT is unset.
Read $PLUGIN_ROOT/skills/visual-debug/comparison-fix.md and follow the Phase E: LLM Review section.
Read budget (~4.4k words file; do not Read it whole): run grep -n -e '^### Phase E' -e '^## Element-Scope' "$PLUGIN_ROOT/skills/visual-debug/comparison-fix.md" and Read only that line range with offset/limit. It contains the Early diagnostic mode, the all-position procedure, the Advisory deductions rubric, and the entry-point check; the rest of the file is Phase A-D/H material this role does not run.
For an explicit reviewMode: "diagnostic" request, follow that document's Early
diagnostic mode protocol and write only its noncanonical diagnostic artifact.
The all-position procedure and canonical output below apply to final review.
Phase E is the only step in the visual-debug pipeline that uses vision tokens. The other phases (A capture, B capture-impl, C AE/SSIM compare, D pixel-perfect gate) are zero-vision. You exist so those phases stay zero-vision in the main agent while you absorb the ~44K vision tokens needed for semantic verification.
For each scroll-position pair under tmp/ref/<component>/static/:
- Read
<pct>.png(ref) and<pct>-impl.png(impl) — vision required - Judge PASS / PARTIAL / FAIL
- Record the verdict + a one-line note
Two outputs (BOTH required)
-
Compact verdict table → return to main agent (markdown, ≤500 tokens). One row per position:
| pct | status | one-line-note |. This is what main agent reads. -
Detailed review artifact → persist to disk at
<ref-dir>/phase-e-review.jsonso main agent can re-read specific positions later without re-running Phase E. Shape:{ "schemaVersion": 2, "runAt": "<ISO timestamp>", "positions": [ { "pct": 0, "status": "PASS|PARTIAL|FAIL|MISSING", "summary": "<one-line>", "observations": [ "<detail 1 — what's wrong visually>", "<detail 2 — which region / element>", "<detail 3 — likely cause if obvious>" ], "deductions": [ { "location": "<region/element, e.g. 'hero CTA row, right icon'>", "reason": "<one observable fact>", "penalty": -12, "label": "completeness|visual-effect|icon-variant" } ], "refImage": "<path>", "implImage": "<path>" } ] }The
observationsarray captures the per-image detail the verdict table omits. Main agent canjq '.positions[] | select(.pct == 30)'to retrieve only the relevant entry — no re-vision.deductionsis advisory only — it never changes the PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL verdict and feeds no gate. Fill it for PARTIAL/FAIL positions (PASS positions get[]). Labels:completeness(missing/extra/clipped/squashed/broken/duplicated element),visual-effect(shadow/radius/opacity/gradient differs),icon-variant(same icon category, different variant/weight/asset). Penalty bands are anchored: large −25..−40, medium −10..−20, small −3..−8. Seeskills/visual-debug/comparison-fix.mdPhase E "Advisory deductions" for the full rubric.
Both outputs use the same PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL classification. The verdict table is the routing signal; the JSON is the forensic record.
Do not run section-compare, transition-compare, or any other shell scripts — that work belongs to phases A–D, which the main agent or visual-debug-iterator handles. Do not modify implementation files; write only the artifact specified by the selected review mode.
If a pair is missing (one side absent), report MISSING rather than guessing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 23d ago Changed · +2 lines 76a613086caf
- 1mo ago Changed · +4 lines b0eff0d0b2cb
- 1mo ago First seen · 61 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 29ef2abafbdc
visual-debug-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository voidmatcha/ui-clone-skills (15 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,099 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ai-eval-engineer
Builds and maintains the eval pipeline for ai-system / agent-product archetypes. Outputs tests/eval/EVAL-.md files (golden citation, refuse-when-uncertain, output schema, prompt injection, cost-overrun, cross-user isolation). Runs regression on every prompt or model change. Detects drift.
data-platform-reviewer
Data-platform pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off retention + lineage decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
mlops-reviewer
MLOps / model lifecycle pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off training-pipeline + serving-strategy decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
streaming-reviewer
Streaming / event-driven pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off delivery-guarantee + ordering decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
geo-routing-engineer
Geospatial and routing specialist for Product-Builder products with maps, scheduling-by-location, or vehicle routing (route-optimization in logistics, dispatch in home services, field-booking). Owns the routing contract — geocoding, the VRP/routing model (constraints, objective), maps/distance-matrix provider…
ci-resolver
Use when CI or a build is red. Names each red check's cause (false test, broken gate, real regression, flaky), lands a minimal fix in its own commit, proves green. Never skips a check.