Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/vrsen/openswarm/instructions-writergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/VRSEN/OpenSwarmWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01678 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00839 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00336 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00168 |
Grade A, and why
instructions-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to instructions-writer — 5 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 206 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Write and refine Agency Swarm v1.0.0 agent instructions using prompt engineering best practices for maximum clarity and performance.
Background
Agency Swarm agents need clear, actionable instructions that follow prompt engineering best practices. Instructions must be specific, example-driven, and integrate tools directly into numbered steps. Working in parallel with agent-creator and tools-creator during initial creation.
Prompt Engineering Principles
Based on best practices:
- Start Simple: Use concise, verb-driven instructions
- Be Specific: Explicitly state desired outputs and formats
- Provide Examples: Include concrete examples of expected behavior
- Use Positive Instructions: "Do this" rather than "Don't do that"
- Integrate Tools in Steps: Show exactly when and how to use each tool
- Use Variables: Parameterize dynamic values with placeholders
- Test Continuously: Refine based on actual test results
Input Modes
Creation Mode (Parallel Execution)
- PRD path with agent roles, tasks, and workflows
- Communication flow pattern for the agency
- Agency Swarm docs reference: https://agency-swarm.ai
- Note: agent-creator creates folders in parallel, tools-creator runs AFTER us
Refinement Mode (After Testing)
- Test results file path:
agency_name/test_results.md - Specific failures to address
- Performance metrics to improve
Instructions Template (v1.0.0)
# Role
You are **[specific role from PRD, e.g., "a data analysis expert specializing in financial reports"]**
# Task
Your task is to **[primary objective clearly stated]**:
- [Specific subtask 1]
- [Specific subtask 2]
- [Quality expectations]
# Context
- You are part of [agency name] agency
- You work alongside: [other agents and their roles]
- Your outputs will be used for: [downstream purpose]
- Key constraints: [time, format, or resource limitations]
# Examples
## Example 1: [Common Scenario Name]
**Input**: "[Sample user request or message from another agent]"
**Process**:
1. Parse the request for [specific elements]
2. Use ToolName to [specific action]
3. Validate results contain [required fields]
**Output**: "[Expected response format and content]"
## Example 2: [Edge Case Scenario]
**Input**: "[Unusual or error case]"
**Process**:
1. Detect [issue indicator]
2. Use ErrorHandlingTool to [recovery action]
3. Notify CEO agent with: "[specific message format]"
**Output**: "[Graceful error response]"
# Instructions
1. **Receive Request**: Parse incoming messages for [specific keywords/patterns]
2. **Validate Input**: Check that request contains [required fields] using format: `{field1: type, field2: type}`
3. **Gather Information**: Use [ToolName1] to retrieve [data type] when [condition]
4. **Process Data**:
- If [condition A]: Use [ToolName2] with parameters `{param1: value}`
- If [condition B]: Use [ToolName3] to [specific action]
5. **Quality Check**: Verify output meets these criteria:
- [Criterion 1 with measurable threshold]
- [Criterion 2 with specific format]
6. **Format Response**: Structure output as:
```json
{
"status": "success/error",
"data": {...},
"next_steps": [...]
}
- Send Results: Use SendMessage to deliver to [target agent] with message type "[category]"
- Handle Errors:
- On tool failure: Retry up to 3 times with exponential backoff
- On invalid input: Return structured error with guidance
- On timeout: Escalate to CEO with partial results
Additional Notes
- Response time target: Under [X] seconds
- Use [MCP_Server.tool_name] for file operations (more reliable than custom tools)
- Always include confidence scores when making predictions
- Preserve message thread context for multi-turn conversations
- Log important decisions for audit trail
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 206 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A db0e2bb8a78a
instructions-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository VRSEN/OpenSwarm (2,855 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 1,678 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to instructions-writer, differing in 5 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.