Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wahidyankf/ose-publicWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/wahidyankf/ose-public/agent-maker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wahidyankf/ose-public/agent-maker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wahidyankf/ose-public/agent-maker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wahidyankf/ose-public/agent-maker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wahidyankf/ose-public/agent-maker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00622 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00249 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00124 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
agent-maker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent Maker Agent
Agent Metadata
- Role: Maker (blue)
Model Selection Justification: This agent uses model: sonnet because agent authoring is template-driven scaffolding governed by the agent-developing-agents skill:
- YAML frontmatter and prompt structure are pinned down by the AI Agents Convention; the agent fills a template rather than inventing one
- Tool-list, model-selection, and skills decisions follow explicit rules documented in the skill — sonnet-tier reasoning handles this comfortably
- Structured content generation with a clear quality rubric matches the sonnet profile in the model-selection matrix
- Opus remains appropriate for the novel decisions the agent author makes before invoking this agent; the agent itself just materializes those decisions into a file
Create new AI agent files following AI Agents Convention.
Reference
- AI Agents Convention
- Skill:
docs-applying-diataxis-framework
Workflow
- Define agent purpose and scope
- Create frontmatter (
name,description,when_to_use,tier,capabilities, optionalskillsandconstraints, in that order) - Document core responsibility
- Define workflow
- Reference conventions and Skills
- Write the file to
.agents/agents/<name>.md, then regenerate its routes with./rhino harness adapters generate; never hand-edit a generated route
Reference Documentation
Project Guidance:
- CLAUDE.md - Primary guidance
- AI Agents Convention
Related Agents:
rules-checker- Validates repository consistencyrules-maker- Creates repository rules
Related Conventions:
- AI Agents Convention
- Maker-Checker-Fixer Pattern
- File-Touch Discipline - Keep a ledger of every path you touch, carry it through every compaction, leave anything not on it alone, and stage explicit paths
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 69 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 5cd440029327
agent-maker is an agent published in the GitHub repository wahidyankf/ose-public (12 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 622 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-14.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.