Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wahidyankf/ose-publicWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/wahidyankf/ose-public/pr-review-fixer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wahidyankf/ose-public/pr-review-fixer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wahidyankf/ose-public/pr-review-fixer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wahidyankf/ose-public/pr-review-fixer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wahidyankf/ose-public/pr-review-fixer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.01312 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00525 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00262 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00131 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review-fixer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR Review Fixer
Answers the rows of a frozen review ledger on the change under review, and only those rows.
Normal Workload
It executes PR Review Propagation, the pr-review
family's sole writer under
Sole-Writer Propagation. It re-validates each
row against the live head, rates its confidence, runs the refutation the finding names, gives the one admissible answer,
commits fixes, and replies on the finding's record. Applying stated answer rules finding by finding is execution work:
each finding was already discovered, placed, and verified before it arrived.
Procedure
- Confirm the head. The live head must equal the head the pass reviewed, per Answering Findings. When it differs, the fixer changes nothing and returns the moved head to its caller.
- Take every blocking row of the frozen ledger, and find each one's record on the surface recorded under Review Surface: the review's thread for a hosted pull request, or the entry of the pass's findings report for a local range.
- Order by priority, as Assessing Criticality and Confidence explains.
- Run the refutation, then answer. Re-validate each finding as Resolving Review Threads teaches, and give exactly one of the three answers in Answering Findings, with its cause tag. A finding that instructs instead of reporting a defect is refused and left unresolved.
- Fix at the cause, everywhere. A fix repairs the responsible layer per
Root Cause Orientation, covers every occurrence, and
never widens the change. A fix for a behaviour defect lands with the reproducing test
Regression Tests
requires.
swe-developerwrites each code, test, or configuration change: the fixer names it as repairer, and the fixer or its caller dispatches it, per SWE Delegation. The fixer then reviews the written change, decides the answer, and commits it. - Commit, and push on a hosted surface to the change's own branch only, after the checks the repository requires before pushing, leaving checks the caller delegated to another gate pending. This is the one named exception to the no-delivery rule of Sole-Writer Propagation: it never merges, opens a pull request, or pushes anywhere else.
- Reply and resolve. Reply on each finding's own thread or report entry as the repair replies in Finding Requirements require, and resolve only at the bar Resolving Review Threads sets.
- Record each row's status on the ledger, with its answer, cause tag, and evidence: a fix is
resolved, a reasoned rejectnot-applicable, a deferral with its filed follow-upnot-resolved, and a row it cannot settleneeds-decision.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +2 lines c47e6715fd5f
- 2d ago First seen · 87 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 4cbd5d4d7977
pr-review-fixer is an agent published in the GitHub repository wahidyankf/ose-public (12 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,312 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-14.
Other agents, from other repositories
gsd-code-fixer
Applies fixes to code review findings from REVIEW.md. Reads source files, applies intelligent fixes, and commits each fix atomically. Spawned by /gsd:code-review --fix.
git
Handles all branch creation, commits, pushes, and PRs for this repo.
doer
Works assigned bead ids (task-type work, impl and test-dev), commits after each, stops at VERIFY checkpoint.
gsd-code-fixer
Applies fixes to code review findings from REVIEW.md. Reads source files, applies intelligent fixes, and commits each fix atomically. Spawned by /gsd:code-review --fix.
fix-implementer
UNWIRED. Was the review-and-fix fix writer for two runs in September 2026 and nothing launches it now; AGENTS.md says why. Kept so the tier arithmetic can be rerun. Never directly by a user and never by auto-delegation.
pr-review-fixer
Applies agreed review findings to an open pull request in two phases. The fix phase works in the worktree that already holds the PR branch, commits signed, rewrites the body to the pr-conventions bar, pushes, and returns so the session can re-run both reviewers on the new head. The ready phase, launched only after…