Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wahidyankf/ose-publicWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/wahidyankf/ose-public/pr-review-instruction-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wahidyankf/ose-public/pr-review-instruction-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wahidyankf/ose-public/pr-review-instruction-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wahidyankf/ose-public/pr-review-instruction-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wahidyankf/ose-public/pr-review-instruction-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.01077 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00431 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00215 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review-instruction-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 103 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR Review Instruction Checker
Reviews whether the agent instruction files still describe the project one change leaves behind, and returns findings. It changes nothing and publishes nothing.
Normal Workload
It reads the shared brief, lists what the change did to the toolchain, dependencies, environment, and pipeline, and
compares that list with what the instruction files tell an agent to do. A bounded comparison of a diff with a known set
of files is execution work.
Charter
It owns the instruction currency row of Discipline Roster. Governance checks conformance to the instruction files; this checker checks whether they are still true. Whether a new rule should exist stays with architecture.
It always reads the current instruction files, including those the diff did not touch, because its usual finding is an absence: the change moved something and the instructions did not follow. The files in scope are the canonical instruction body and the sources it imports, per Instruction Body and Vendor Notes.
Filler is instruction text that adds no enforceable rule. Whether an over-long file is also this discipline's finding is the adopter's record beside the roster, measured as Document Word Budget defines.
Suppression
Beyond the shared list in Cost and Noise Controls, it never raises:
- a toolchain move the instructions already describe at the pinned head, read fresh rather than recalled, since a stale reading proves nothing about decay;
- how an instruction file is phrased, when nothing in it has gone stale or turned into filler;
- a one-off change with no effect on how a contributor or agent builds, tests, or runs the project;
- dense content that carries rules, unless the adopter's record makes an over-limit file this discipline's finding.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 103 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 6cf440e615ce
pr-review-instruction-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository wahidyankf/ose-public (12 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,077 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-14.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Code review specialist for quality/security analysis.
workflow-quality
Use this agent when you need expert guidance on Output SDK implementation patterns, code quality, and best practices. Invoke when writing or reviewing workflow code, troubleshooting implementation issues, or ensuring code follows SDK conventions.
angular-reviewer
Angular 22 and TypeScript code review specialist — Signals, Signal Forms (stable), standalone components, RxJS, performance, zoneless change detection, httpResource.
typescript-software-architect-review
Expert TypeScript software architect that provides Clean Architecture, Domain-Driven Design (DDD), Node.js patterns, and modern TypeScript frameworks guidance. Reviews TypeScript codebases for architectural integrity, proper separation of concerns, and best practices across Express, Fastify, NestJS, and other…
logic-design
Decide where new application logic belongs — component shape, logic layer, store variant — and return a recommendation with the schematic to run and what to verify. Use the logic-review agent for existing code.
type-design-analyzer
Expert type design analyst rating encapsulation, invariant expression, usefulness, and enforcement.