Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Wania-Kazmi/claude-code-autonomous-agent-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/wania-kazmi/claude-code-autonomous-agent-workflow/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wania-kazmi/claude-code-autonomous-agent-workflow/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wania-kazmi/claude-code-autonomous-agent-workflow/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wania-kazmi/claude-code-autonomous-agent-workflow/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wania-kazmi/claude-code-autonomous-agent-workflow/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00679 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00272 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00136 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 111 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 199ec51d1002
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Wania-Kazmi/claude-code-autonomous-agent-workflow (5 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 679 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Read-only adversarial reviewer. Pre-PR it returns a verdict for the arbiter; on an open PR it posts true line-anchored INLINE comments via the git-host API, written in the PR's own language. Scores risk and checks cross-service compatibility. Never edits code.
arbiter
Meta-reviewer and loop-breaker. Governs both phases (pre-PR and on-PR review), enforces the gates and cycle limits, and decides continue/approve/escalate so agents never loop. Risk-aware and multi-service aware.
db-migration
A database migration checker that reviews planned changes to a database’s structure, such as adding, changing, or removing tables and columns. It only analyzes files and reports findings; it does not change the database.
code-reviewer
Senior code reviewer for production readiness. Reviews completed work against plans, specs, and coding standards. Dispatched after major tasks, features, or before merge.
code-reviewer
An automated code reviewer that examines changes before they are merged. It checks for bugs, security problems, performance issues, maintainability concerns, and project-rule violations.
review-agent-csk
Code review specialist. Use immediately after writing or modifying a nontrivial diff: audits whether it improves the system's code health, against the four principles (simplicity, surgical change, readability, altitude). Findings via code-review-csk; writes no code.