Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to war851/AI-Governance-Architecture. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/war851/AI-Governance-Architecture/main/.claude/agents/code-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/war851/AI-Governance-ArchitectureWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/war851/ai-governance-architecture/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/war851/ai-governance-architecture/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/war851/ai-governance-architecture/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/war851/ai-governance-architecture/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/war851/ai-governance-architecture/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00152 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00061 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00030 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 19 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 8f4c2f1c804d
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository war851/AI-Governance-Architecture (56 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 152 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
review-synthesizer
Synthesizes the verdict of a staged code review from probe evidence - bugs and logic, tests, and security remits, every finding citing evidence.
review-executor-codex
Runs one read-only review probe on the Codex harness and returns the same evidence JSON as review-executor, so the staged review can run its cheap stage on the Codex plan when it is available and the work is trusted.
finding-triage
Post-processes reviewer reports — consolidates findings, classifies each by severity and whether it blocks the current change. Sequential. Produces a unified read-only triage report for the verdict-aggregator and explicit checkpoint persistence.
tribunal-lens-reviewer
Dispatched by the tribunal deep-audit lane to review one lens or independently verify a candidate. Reads its mandate under {{IF:claude}}skills{{ELSE}}routines{{END}}/tribunal/references/lenses/. Never dispatch directly.
decision-challenger
Adversarial red-team reviewer of ADRs. Builds the strongest case against each decision, names load-bearing assumptions, assigns confidence 1–5, and surfaces evidence that would prove a decision wrong. Read-only. Dispatched optionally by decision-variance. Reads ADRs from .codearbiter/decisions/.
dependency-reviewer
Dispatched when package.json, lock files, or container base images change. Verifies license, provenance, maintenance signal, and supply-chain posture against .codearbiter/security-controls.md and .codearbiter/tech-stack.md before merge.