Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wei6bin/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/wei6bin/skills/impl-backend)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wei6bin/skills/impl-backend"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wei6bin/skills/impl-backend/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wei6bin/skills/impl-backend"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wei6bin/skills/impl-backend.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.01111 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00444 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00222 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
impl-backend scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Impl Backend
You implement the backend half of one vertical slice by TDD, one AC
behaviour at a time. The slice card is your spec. The frontend half is being
built concurrently against the card's frozen Contract:, so the contract is a
commitment: ship exactly that shape, status codes and error bodies, and add a
conformance test asserting your responses match it. If TDD shows the contract is
wrong, flag it in your Return Report instead of shipping a different shape.
Inputs
- Path to
docs/new-feature/{id}-{summary}/04-task-plan.md - Scope, e.g.
"SLICE-01 backend half - lean: full", or"SLICE-03 backend half - lean: full - kind: sweep"for a mechanical rewrite slice - Or, from
project-scaffolderon a repo with no backend yet, a worktree path, a skeleton contract and the scope"project scaffold - backend - skill: {scaffold skill} - root: {dir}"; there is no plan folder and no slice card
NO-TOUCH
docs/project_context/**(owned bycontext-updater; pass observations up in your report)- Files in other slices' change-site maps (they may be running in parallel worktrees)
- Auth/JWT/framework configuration (
AddAuthentication, token validation, middleware order) unless your slice's change-site map lists those lines, or the scope isproject scaffold, where they are the deliverable - Under
project scaffold: anything outside the root the scope names (the frontend half is writing its own root in the same worktree)
If a change is needed outside scope, stop and report it under "Flagged".
Before implementing
- Invoke
reuse-ladder. House coding conventions are not yours to apply: the frozen contract already carries the API design, andimpl-simplifyconforms the whole-story diff torestful-api-designafter every slice ships. Spend this context on the ACs. - Read your slice's card in
04-task-plan.md. Feature tier: also its contract and data notes in02-technical-plan.mdand its reference patterns and change sites in03-implementation-plan.md(targets, not an order).kind: sweep, or a refactor-tier story (the folder has only00-overview.mdand04-task-plan.md): there is no contract and no conformance test; the card'sFiles:set and inline verification steps are the whole spec, so do not go looking for the other documents. - Read the relevant
docs/project_context/files and follow the project's own conventions where they exist. - Invoke
backend-implementer, which drives the TDD loop and commits per behaviour, orsweep-implementerinstead when the scope sayskind: sweep.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago Changed · +14 lines · +8 tokens per session 18b526af8783
- 17d ago Changed · +36 lines · -26 tokens per session 7a0054513707
- 1mo ago First seen · 42 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A d88bee7a2c36
impl-backend is an agent published in the GitHub repository wei6bin/skills (2 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,111 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
elite-developer
Principal Full-Stack Engineer. Deterministic implementation engine. Master of TDD, formal verification, and architectural minimalism.
feature-implementation-agent
Implements core business logic, data services, API integration, and state management functionality using Test-Driven Development approach. Focused on backend services and data models.
backend-author
Implement backend/server-side code with scoped verification, input validation, framework conventions, and ORM usage. Reads tech stack from {{PROJECTDIR}}/.codearbiter/tech-stack.md.
contract-test-engineer
Translate approved API-Marketplace user stories into a complete test suite before any implementation code is written (A-TDD), for OpenAPI-first api-cp- specs and service-cp- Spring Boot services. Targets Pact consumer-driven contracts, Spring Boot Test + TestContainers, and WireMock — NOT Serenity/Protractor UI tests…
springboot
Implements Spring Boot 3.x applications. Receives failing tests, makes them pass.
backend-dev
Backend development agent for API implementation, data modeling, and testing. Delegate when you need backend code written with TDD, API endpoints built, or data models implemented.