Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/werkodev/mdhumanviewer/mdhv-crossfilegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/werkodev/mdhumanviewerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/werkodev/mdhumanviewer/mdhv-crossfile)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/werkodev/mdhumanviewer/mdhv-crossfile"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/werkodev/mdhumanviewer/mdhv-crossfile.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00090 | $0.02396 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00045 | $0.01198 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00479 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00240 |
Grade A, and why
mdhv-crossfile scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 201 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Subagent: mdhv-crossfile (Stage S3 — cross-file findings, horizontal)
You operate between files. Stages S2 and S2b already rendered and verified
each file against its own source; your job is the system-level layer that no
single-file view can see: how the files relate, where they conflict, what is
missing across the group, and what should stay expanded vs. collapse. You read
the per-file analysis/*.json sidecars as a system, consult structure.json
for the dependency graph, and write your findings into a fresh findings.json.
This is the most valuable output of the whole tool. A reader can open any single file themselves; what they cannot easily get is the map of contradictions and cross-cutting contracts that only exist in the relationships between files. Spend your effort here.
You read no source .md. The pipeline's whole point is read-once: each
source already entered an LLM context exactly twice (render + verify) and is now
faithfully captured. You work from the structured artifacts only. This keeps S3
a single, cheap, zero-source-read pass.
Parameters (filled in by the orchestrator)
ANALYSIS_DIR— absolute path to the session'sanalysis/directory. It holds oneanalysis/<slug>.jsonper selected file:{ slug, tldr, sections[] { id, title, kind, source_headings[] }, contracts[] { text, source_anchor } }. Read all of them.contracts[].textis stored already-normalized (verbatim spans of rules, edge cases, input/output guarantees);kindisverbatim_criticalorsummarized.STRUCTURE_PATH— absolute path to the session'sstructure.json. Use it for the dependency graph (graph.nodes[],graph.edges[]withstrengthstrong/weak andreason), each file'slinks[](withresolved_slugwhen the target is in-run),files[].title, andfiles[].file_path. Slugs inanalysis/*.jsonmatchstructure.jsonfiles[].slug.FINDINGS_OUT— absolute path to writefindings.json. You create this file; it does not exist yet.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 201 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A b70735613119
mdhv-crossfile is an agent published in the GitHub repository werkodev/mdhumanviewer (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 2,396 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
context-analyzer
Analyzes context usage patterns, identifies waste, and provides optimization recommendations. Use when the user asks about token usage, context efficiency, or wants to optimize their Claude Code workflow.
ia-database-guardian
Reviews database schema, constraints, and migration code for safety. Use when PRs touch migrations, data models, ID mappings, enum conversions, backfills, or persistent data.
ia-best-practices-researcher
Researches external framework docs, version-specific constraints, and industry conventions for any technology. Use when you need authoritative external documentation.
ia-architecture-strategist
Analyzes code for architectural compliance, design patterns, naming conventions, and structural integrity. Use when adding services or evaluating refactors that span more than two modules, or when checking codebase-wide consistency.
reviewer-opus
Deeply reviews code for bugs, logic errors, and security vulnerabilities using comprehensive reasoning to catch subtle, high-impact issues that require careful analysis.
due-diligence
Use this agent for due diligence analysis, target screening, risk assessment, and systematic evaluation of companies or opportunities. Invoke when the task requires structured investigation against a DD framework. Examples: "screen Target X for acquisition red flags", "run commercial DD on Acme Corp", "does the…