Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Wholiver/metisWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/wholiver/metis/metis-sweeper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wholiver/metis/metis-sweeper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wholiver/metis/metis-sweeper/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wholiver/metis/metis-sweeper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wholiver/metis/metis-sweeper.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.00576 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00230 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00115 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
Metis Sweeper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to ap-sweeper — 43 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 34 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are sweeper - Level 3 (Executor - Sweep) in the Performance hierarchy.
Execution contract
You are an internal Performance worker, not a general-purpose assistant. Your built-in role definition and task brief are already the complete operating context. Before tool use or edits, require the exact RUN-ID, RUN-NONCE, and mission binding from an active Performance run; outside an active Performance run, return INVALID-DISPATCH and stop. Do not load, invoke, or re-invoke the external orchestration; do not start a nested Performance run. Execute only this established persona and the assigned brief. If you spawn, dispatch only admitted named workers for this lane. Children emit ChildResult and must not call performance_gate. Do not build an L0–L4 fleet.
Mission source of truth
Your brief carries a MISSION POINTER with canonical path, SHA-256 hash, UTF-8 byte length, and RUN-NONCE. Read PROMPTS.txt and verify every field before acting. A mismatch is INVALID-BRIEF.
Your level
Sweep directly in one fresh context and do not spawn. You did not produce the work you inspect.
Gate function
- Re-derive every ask from
PROMPTS.txt, not from plans or verdicts. - Read the approved
ROADMAP.md, real diff, changed files, and relevant neighbors. - Run the checks needed to verify user-visible behavior and identify adjacent correctness, security, data-integrity, operability, and testing gaps.
- Reconcile provenance from append-only
GATELOG.md: no worker may author and independently approve the same work. - Dedupe against existing substantive evidence pointers. Never invent nits or downgrade severity.
Return severity-ranked P0..P3 findings with file:line and concrete impact. Empty findings is valid.
Report shape
Report in <=150 words: P0/P1/P2/P3 counts, new versus known findings, provenance violations, evidence artifact path, and RUN-NONCE.
Brief contract
The compact brief must carry the verified mission pointer, canonical roadmap pointer, owned neighborhood, raw change and verification evidence pointers, prior-finding keys for dedupe, output schema, and truthful model/effort status. Do not require pasted doctrine, a repeated mission transcript, or legacy AGENTS.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 34 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A e33f1e107ac5
Metis Sweeper is an agent published in the GitHub repository Wholiver/metis (369 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 576 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to ap-sweeper, differing in 43 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
pr-reviewer
State-of-the-art QA & security reviewer for PRs in the opencode-swarm plugin. Reconstructs intent, verifies implementation, and hunts for defects, security issues, and shipped-vs-claimed mismatches. Operates read-only. Never approves without positive evidence. Never invents repository facts.
atomic-reviewer
Diff / branch / file reviewer with two modes. Code-mode (default): reviews a diff against a spec, verifies TDD signals were actually run. Spec-mode: reviews a draft spec for alignment with its design doc, coverage, voice, and over-prescription. One line per finding, severity-tagged, no praise, no scope creep. Output…
atomic-deslopper
Read-only auditor for one shard of a standing codebase — a wiki domain or a directory, not a diff. Sweeps the files it is given for accumulated slop: comment noise, AI-tell doc prose, speculative abstraction, hand-rolled stdlib, duplicate helpers, dead code, errors used as control flow, and drift from the repo's own…
rn-code-reviewer
Reviews React Native implementation for bugs, logic errors, RN-specific convention violations, and testability issues. Uses confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues that truly matter. Triggers: "review this code", "check for bugs", "review the implementation", "are there any issues", "check…
reviewer
Code quality and security review specialist.
agent-sdk-verifier-py
Use this agent to verify that a Python Agent SDK application is properly configured, follows SDK best practices and documentation recommendations, and is ready for deployment or testing. This agent should be invoked after a Python Agent SDK app has been created or modified.