Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wildcard/caroWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/wildcard/caro/oss-legal-advisor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wildcard/caro/oss-legal-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wildcard/caro/oss-legal-advisor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wildcard/caro/oss-legal-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wildcard/caro/oss-legal-advisor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01121 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00561 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00224 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
oss-legal-advisor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 111 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A fcd0b745fda3
oss-legal-advisor is an agent published in the GitHub repository wildcard/caro (37 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,121 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other agents, from other repositories
patent-mapper
Patent, trademark, and copyright mapper. Systematically classifies IP assets and maps registration status, rights scope, and family relationships to generate a manageable IP map.
security-engineer
Security scanning, vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, and compliance review. Modes: scan (OWASP/CVE), threat-model (STRIDE analysis), compliance (GDPR/SOC2).
swiss-judicial-analyst
Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.
folha-pagamento-mensal
Especialista em folha CLT mensal — cálculo de salário base + adicionais (peric/insal/noturno/HE), descontos (INSS faixa progressiva, IRRF, VT 6%, plano saúde, faltas), FGTS 8%, dissídio/CCT vigente, holerite. Use proativamente quando o usuário (a) fecha folha do mês, (b) menciona holerite, INSS efetivo, dissídio…
esther
Use this agent when reviewing terms of service, privacy policies, ensuring regulatory compliance, or handling legal requirements. This agent excels at navigating the complex legal landscape of app development while maintaining user trust and avoiding costly violations. Examples:\n\n \nContext: Launching app in…
spec-compliance-reviewer
Stage 1 of two-stage review. Verifies code does what spec said. Binary pass/fail outcome. Does NOT check code quality — that is Stage 2. If Stage 1 fails, Stage 2 does not run.