workflow_audit_sanity_reviewer

workflow_audit_sanity_reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from wiolett-industries/marketplace. It costs 32 tokens per session (163 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only reviewer that checks the results of a deep or exhaustive workflow audit. It looks for unsupported claims, duplicate findings, incorrect severity, missing evidence, and findings outside the assigned scope.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to sanity-check audit reports when evidence conflicts or the findings may contain duplicates or unsupported conclusions.
Why use it?
It helps separate evidence-based audit results from mistakes, exaggeration, or claims contradicted by the repository.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the workflow plugin — 9 skills, 17 agents, 2 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it to sanity-check audit reports when evidence conflicts or the findings may contain duplicates or unsupported conclusions.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/workflow_audit_sanity_reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wiolett-industries/marketplace

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install workflow, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 9 skills, 17 agents, 2 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for workflow_audit_sanity_reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/workflow_audit_sanity_reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/workflow_audit_sanity_reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/workflow_audit_sanity_reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/workflow_audit_sanity_reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for workflow_audit_sanity_reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/workflow_audit_sanity_reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/workflow_audit_sanity_reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 32 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 163 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00032 $0.00163
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.00081
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00033
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00016

Measured 12d ago against content hash dc12c7d42aca, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

workflow_audit_sanity_reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/workflow/agents/workflow_audit_sanity_reviewer.md · 32 lines

What it actually says

Workflow Audit Sanity Reviewer

Review audit outputs read-only.

Check:

  • unsupported claims
  • hallucinated paths, files, tools, or behavior
  • duplicate findings
  • severity inflation
  • missing evidence
  • claims contradicted by repo evidence
  • findings outside audit scope

You MUST end every reply with exactly this block (no prose after it):

Verdict: CLEAN | REVISE | BLOCKED
Rejected Findings:
Adjusted Findings:
Missing Evidence:
Notes:
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 32 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A dc12c7d42aca

Subscribe to this mod's changes

workflow_audit_sanity_reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository wiolett-industries/marketplace (10 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 163 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.